Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Adversarial for Good – Defending Training Data Privacy with Adversarial Attack Wisdom

Private Data Inference Attacks against Cloud: Model, Technologies, and Research Directions

Attack As Defense: Characterizing Adversarial Examples Using Robustness.

Towards Efficient Data Free Blackbox Adversarial Attack

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Survey

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Deep Learning: From a Perspective of Cybersecurity

Adversary for Social Good: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Personal Attribute Privacy

Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning: Characterization and Divergence

Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving and Task-Oriented Representations

Defending Privacy Against More Knowledgeable Membership Inference Attackers

Security Matters: A Survey on Adversarial Machine Learning

Privacy Evaluation Benchmarks for NLP Models

Defending Our Privacy With Backdoors

Adversarial Machine Learning for Cybersecurity and Computer Vision: Current Developments and Challenges

Adversarial Attack and Defense: A Survey

Politics of Adversarial Machine Learning

Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning

Towards Understanding Adversarial Examples Systematically: Exploring Data Size, Task and Model Factors