Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Differentially Private and Adversarially Robust Machine Learning: An Empirical Evaluation

Differentially Private Optimizers Can Learn Adversarially Robust Models

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learning

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Discriminative Adversarial Privacy: Balancing Accuracy and Membership Privacy in Neural Networks

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Training Private Models That Know What They Don't Know

Learning to be adversarially robust and differentially private

A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning

Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?

Membership inference attack on differentially private block coordinate descent

Generalization Techniques Empirically Outperform Differential Privacy against Membership Inference

Improving Differentially Private Models with Active Learning

Investigating Membership Inference Attacks under Data Dependencies

Differentially Private Algorithms for Empirical Machine Learning

Augment then Smooth: Reconciling Differential Privacy with Certified Robustness

Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization

Assessing differentially private deep learning with Membership Inference

Mitigating Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy in Differentially Private Learning.