Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks: RM Learning is All You Need

Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Classification Models

Center-Based Relaxed Learning Against Membership Inference Attacks

Defenses to Membership Inference Attacks: A Survey

MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace Training

Membership reconstruction attack in deep neural networks

Label-Only Membership Inference Attack Based on Model Explanation

Order of Magnitude Speedups for LLM Membership Inference

Dual Defense: Combining Preemptive Exclusion of Members and Knowledge Distillation to Mitigate Membership Inference Attacks

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks

Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization

Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge Transfer

Resisting membership inference attacks through knowledge distillation

Membership Inference via Backdooring

Diffence: Fencing Membership Privacy With Diffusion Models

Defending Privacy Against More Knowledgeable Membership Inference Attackers

Can Membership Inferencing be Refuted?

Understanding and defending against White-box membership inference attack in deep learning

Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning in the Wild: Membership Inference Attacks against Transfer Learning

Overconfidence is a Dangerous Thing: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Enforcing Less Confident Prediction