1D photonic crystal direct bandgap GeSn-on-insulator laser

Hyo-Jun Joo,Youngmin Kim,Daniel Burt,Yongduck Jung,Lin Zhang,Melvina Chen,Samuel Jior Parluhutan,Dong-Ho Kang,Chulwon Lee,Simone Assali,Zoran Ikonic,Oussama Moutanabbir,Yong-Hoon Cho,Chuan Seng Tan,Donguk Nam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0066935
IF: 4
2021-11-15
Applied Physics Letters
Abstract:GeSn alloys have been regarded as a potential lasing material for a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor-compatible light source. Despite their remarkable progress, all GeSn lasers reported to date have large device footprints and active areas, which prevent the realization of densely integrated on-chip lasers operating at low power consumption. Here, we present a 1D photonic crystal nanobeam with a very small device footprint of 7 μm2 and a compact active area of ∼1.2 μm2 on a high-quality GeSn-on-insulator substrate. We also report that the improved directness in our strain-free nanobeam lasers leads to a lower threshold density and a higher operating temperature compared to the compressive strained counterparts. The threshold density of the strain-free nanobeam laser is ∼18.2 kW cm−2 at 4 K, which is significantly lower than that of the unreleased nanobeam laser (∼38.4 kW cm−2 at 4 K). Lasing in the strain-free nanobeam device persists up to 90 K, whereas the unreleased nanobeam shows quenching of lasing at a temperature of 70 K. Our demonstration offers an avenue toward developing practical group-IV light sources with high-density integration and low power consumption.
physics, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?