Abstract:Reward-motivated memory has been studied extensively in psychology and neuroscience. Most studies follow the same type of paradigm: stimuli are cued at encoding with high or low reward values which indicate the amount the stimulus is worth if successfully remembered on a subsequent memory test, usually recognition. Each incorrect endorsement of a lure at retrieval is penalized with an arbitrary value between the high and low reward value, resulting in a single false alarm rate. Studies employing this type of paradigm have reported higher hit rates for high value items compared to low value items, but generally hit rate is the only measure of memory that is reported as a function of reward value. This leaves open the possibility that high reward items have a higher hit rate because participants are more willing to endorse those items as “old”, due to biases in the reward structure of these paradigms. Other measures, like discriminability and response bias, are overlooked when there is only a single false alarm rate, but we hypothesize that these other measures are also susceptible to motivational manipulations. To test whether reward motivation influences these other factors, we created a novel paradigm that associated rewards with categories (indoor vs. outdoor scenes), allowing for a separate false alarm rate as well as hit rate at each level of reward. We report results of three experiments that varied when reward cues were introduced and the penalties associated with false alarms for the categorized items. We replicated prior findings of higher hit rates for high compared to low reward items, but consistently across three experiments, when d’ was calculated, we found no difference in memory discriminability as a function of reward. Further, in two experiments we found that response bias was more conservative for low reward items: participants were more likely to endorse a “new” response to low compared to high reward items. This latter effect of reward on response bias did not occur when the amount of the false alarm penalty matched the possible reward. Our findings reveal that reward motivation influences memory, but also decisional biases thought to be independent of memory processes. The amount of both the reward value of the target items, and the amount of the false alarm penalty should be considered when designing experimental paradigms to study motivation-cognition interactions.

Verbal overshadowing and decision criterion effects on recognition memory for faces

Everyday amnesia: Residual memory for high confidence misses and implications for decision models of recognition.

Persistence of the verbal overshadowing and weapon-focus effects on lineup identification performance.

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory

Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.

How Does Social Competition Affect True and False Recognition?

Memory Asymmetry of Forward and Backward Associations in Recognition Tasks

A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.

Recognition-induced forgetting is caused by episodic, not semantic, memory retrieval tasks

Information perseveration in recognition memory: Examining the scope of sequential dependencies

Effects of emotional ambiguity and emotional intensity on true and false memory

Recognition memory decisions made with short- and long-term retrieval

Does ROC asymmetry reverse when detecting new stimuli? Reinvestigating whether the retrievability of mnemonic information is task-dependent

Parallel effects of processing fluency and positive affect on familiarity-based recognition decisions for faces

Facial Recall: Feature-Conjunction Effects in Source Retrieval Versus Item Recognition

Criterion shifting in an unfamiliar face-matching task: Effects of base rates, payoffs, and perceptual discriminability.

Perceptual Expertise of Forensic Examiners and Reviewers on Tests of Cross‐Race and Disguised Face Identification and Face Memory

Does presenting perpetrator and innocent suspect faces from different facial angles influence the susceptibility of eyewitness memory? An investigation into the misinformation effect and eyewitness misidentification

Reward Motivation Influences Response Bias on a Recognition Memory Task

Selective attention effects on recognition: the roles of list context and perceptual difficulty

The Effect of Masker Type and Word-Position on Word Recall and Sentence Understanding