Abstract:His bundle pacing (HBP) has emerged as a feasible alternative to right (RVP) and biventricular pacing (BVP) for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). This study sought to assess, in ex-vivo experimental models, the optimal setup for HBP in terms of electrode placement and pacing protocol to achieve superior electrical synchrony in the case of complete His-Purkinje block and left bundle branch block (LBBB). We developed a 3D model of His bundle and bundle branches, embedded in a patient-specific biventricular heart model reconstructed from CT images. A monodomain reaction-diffusion model was adopted to describe the propagation of cardiac action potential, and a custom procedure was developed to compute pseudo-ECGs. Experimental measurements of tip electrode potential waveforms have been performed on ex-vivo swine myocardium to determine the appropriate boundary condition for delivering the electrical stimulus in the numerical model. An extended parametric analysis, investigating the effect of the electrode orientation and helix length, pacing protocol, and atrioventricular delay, allowed us to determine the optimal setup for HBP therapy. Both selective (S-HBP) and non-selective (NS-HBP) His bundle pacing were tested, as the variable anatomical location of the His bundle can result in the activation of the surrounding myocardium. Our study indicates a perpendicular placement of the electrode as the most advantageous for restoring the physiological function of the His-Purkinje system. We found that higher-energy protocols can compensate for the effects of an angled placement though concurring to potential tip fibrosis. Promisingly, we also revealed that an increased electrode helix length can provide optimal resynchronization even with low-energy pacing protocols. Our results provide informative guidance for implant procedure and therapy optimization, which will hopefully have clinical implications further improving the procedural success rates and patients' quality of life, due to reduced incidence of lead revision and onset of complications.

Overcoming Lead Penetration Failure in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing

Anatomical and Histological Assessment of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Human Heart with Refractory Heart Failure

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy

Lead performance of stylet-driven leads in left bundle branch area pacing: results from a large single-center cohort and insights from in-vitro bench testing

Systematic Review of Leadless Pacemaker

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Long-Term Lead Performance by Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Procedure-Related Complications of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience

Pitfalls and tips for lumenless lead extraction inserted deep within the ventricular septum

Early Experience of Left Bundle Branch Pacing with Lumenless Lead in a Single Center: A Case Series

Intracardiac Ultrasound-Guided Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Bradycardia Patient.

Electrophysiological characteristics of lead-position-dependent EGM uninterrupted transition during left bundle branch pacing

Left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing From a Femoral Approach in a Patient Without Superior Access

A novel 9-partition method using fluoroscopic images for guiding left bundle branch pacing

Lumenless and Stylet-Driven Leads for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Materials, Techniques, Benefits, and Trade-Offs of the Two Approaches

Helix breakage during left bundle pacing area implantation

Interaction between left bundle branch area pacing lead and defibrillator lead: a case report.

A Simulation Study of the Effects of His Bundle Pacing in Left Bundle Branch Block

Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study

Comparison of Procedural Outcomes of Lumenless Fixed-Helix Versus Stylet-Driven Extendable-Helix Lead Systems in Left Bundle Branch Pacing: COMPARE LBBP