Abstract:The brain is thought to generate internal predictions, based on previous statistical regularities in the environment, to optimise behaviour. Predictive processing has been repeatedly demonstrated and seemingly explains expectation suppression (ES), or the attenuation of neural activity in response to expected stimuli. However, the mechanisms behind ES are unclear and various models of the mechanisms supporting ES have been suggested with conflicting evidence. Sharpening models propose that expectations suppress neurons that are not tuned to the expected stimulus, increasing the signal-to-noise ratio for expected stimuli. In contrast, dampening models posit that expectations suppress neurons that are tuned to the expected stimuli, increasing the relative response amplitude for unexpected stimuli. Previous studies have used decoding analyses to examine these effects, with increases in decoding accuracy interpreted in terms of sharpening and decreases related to dampening. The opposing process theory (OPT) has suggested that both processes may occur at different time points, namely that initial sharpening is followed by later dampening of the neural representations of the expected stimulus as learning progresses. In this study we aim to test this theory and shed light on the dynamics of expectation effects, both at single trial level and over time. Thirty-one participants completed a statistical learning task consisting of paired scene categories whereby a “leading” image from one category is quickly followed by a “trailing” image from a different category. Multivariate EEG analyses focussed on decoding stimulus information related to the trailing image category. Within-trial, decoding analyses showed that stimulus expectation increased decoding accuracy at early latencies and decreased decoding accuracy at later latencies, in line with OPT. However, across trials, stimulus expectation decreased decoding accuracy in initial trials and increased decoding accuracy in later trials. We theorise that these dissociable dynamics of expectation effects within and across trials can be explained in the context of hierarchical learning mechanisms. Our single trial results provide evidence for the OPT, while our results over time suggest that sharpening and dampening effects emerge at different stages of learning.

The Causes and Consequences of Drifting Expectations

Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making

Hey, What is Your Choice? Uncertainty and Inconsistency Enhance Subjective Anticipation of Upcoming Information in a Social Context

Individual differences in naturalistic learning link negative emotionality to the development of anxiety

Predictors of Coping With Expectation Violation: An Integrative Review

Learning about Expectation Violation from Prediction Error Paradigms – A Meta-Analysis on Brain Processes Following a Prediction Error

Coping with expectation violations in education: the role of optimism bias and need for cognitive closure

Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential

Acute stress impairs reward positivity effect in probabilistic learning

Depression is associated with blunted affective responses to naturalistic reward prediction errors

Dynamic expectations: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of sub-second updates in reward predictions

Probabilistic Outcomes Are Valued Less in Expectation, Even Conditional on Their Realization

This Ought to Be Good: Brain Activity Accompanying Positive and Negative Expectations and Outcomes.

Expectations do not need to be accurate to be maintained: Valence and need for cognitive closure predict expectation update vs. persistence

Anticipatory Anxiety and Wishful Thinking

Dissociable dynamic effects of expectation during statistical learning

Distinct computational mechanisms of uncertainty processing explain opposing exploratory behaviors in anxiety and apathy

Optimistic Risk Perception in the Temporal Difference error Explains the Relation between Risk-taking, Gambling, Sensation-seeking and Low Fear

New Paradigms for the Old Question: Challenging the Expectation Rule Held by Risky Decision-Making Theories

Do we "fear for the worst" or "Hope for the best" in thinking about the unexpected?: Factors affecting the valence of unexpected outcomes reported for everyday scenarios

Learning to Love Uncertainty