Abstract:This paper investigates the conditions under which the phenomenon of of small is less likely to occur and their implications with regard to certain business and marketing issues. Based on recent findings in behavioral economics, the authors demonstrated that when the difference in outcome values reduces, disappears, or is no longer apparent, an alternative with a small probability is less likely to be overweighed. Further, the authors suggested a status quo effect in the weighting of a small probability with reference to people's wealth. By applying the theoretical results to a promotional context, the authors found that using a promotional incentive that offers a small chance of winning a large amount is more effective for high-priced products than for low-priced products. To test the hypotheses, three experimental studies using student subjects were performed sequentially. Each experiment had specific objectives and involved the use of a factorial design. In line with previous findings, Study 1 indicated that as the associated payoff sizes increase in choice problems, the overweighting of small probabilities tends to diminish.More importantly, when no value comparison is presented, the overweighting of small probabilities is less likely to occur. Moreover, it showed that there is a preference discrepancy between choice and matching and that the weighting of probabilities is more consistent in the matching context than in the choice context.In Study 2, the above findings were employed in issues related to lotteries and insurance pricing. The study demonstrated that consumers are more reluctant to buy a lottery or air insurance at a higher price, even if the expected payoff increases accordingly. Moreover, at the same price, the wealthier group of people is more willing to accept the lottery or insurance. Study 3 was a mixed experimental design involving eight products in four categories. In all four categories, the results showed that sweepstakes are more effective than premiumsin selling high-priced products;however, there is no significant difference between these two schemes when selling low-priced products. The findings systematically demonstrated that the of small probabilitiesis context dependent. The research provides incremental evidence for the contingent weighting model and consumer preference reversals. From the perspective of a behavioral researcher, given the different levels of outcomes, coupled with the uncertainty of how small probabilities should be interpreted, the results can be explained by differential attention and information processing. From the perspective of a decision theorist, the results reflect a strong boundary condition that contradicts the commonly held belief that probabilities and values are independent of each other. Finally, the findings have important managerial implications in successful pricing and promotional design.

Probabilistic Outcomes Are Valued Less in Expectation, Even Conditional on Their Realization

Are decisions under risk malleable?

The same but different: an empirical investigation of the reducibility principle

Extreme Outcomes Accentuate Overweighting of Low Probabilities and Underweighting of High Probabilities in Experience‐Based Choice

A Further Exploration of the Uncertainty Effect

A closer examination of the risk–reward correlation: an individual-level analysis and exploration in the loss domain

Risk Preferences in Time Lotteries

Exceeding Expectations: Stochastic Dominance as a General Decision Theory

Gambling under unknown probabilities as a proxy for real world decisions under uncertainty

Weighting of Small Probabilities and Its Market Applications

A puzzle of roulette gambling

The neural correlates of subjective utility of monetary outcome and probability weight in economic and in motor decision under risk

Music-evoked incidental happiness modulates probability weighting during risky lottery choices

Reduction of compound lotteries with objective probabilities: Theory and evidence

Who shows the Unlikelihood Effect – and why?

When (and why) absolute decision attribute values influence human preferences

Risk and Intertemporal Preferences over Time Lotteries

Good fortune but bad luck? Predictable versus unpredictable gains and losses in risky choice

Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show

Neural Mechanism Underlying Risk Attitude and Probability Distortion: One Two-Stage Model of Valuation and Choice