Abstract:The brain is thought to generate internal predictions, based on previous statistical regularities in the environment, to optimise behaviour. Predictive processing has been repeatedly demonstrated and seemingly explains expectation suppression (ES), or the attenuation of neural activity in response to expected stimuli. However, the mechanisms behind ES are unclear and various models of the mechanisms supporting ES have been suggested with conflicting evidence. Sharpening models propose that expectations suppress neurons that are not tuned to the expected stimulus, increasing the signal-to-noise ratio for expected stimuli. In contrast, dampening models posit that expectations suppress neurons that are tuned to the expected stimuli, increasing the relative response amplitude for unexpected stimuli. Previous studies have used decoding analyses to examine these effects, with increases in decoding accuracy interpreted in terms of sharpening and decreases related to dampening. The opposing process theory (OPT) has suggested that both processes may occur at different time points, namely that initial sharpening is followed by later dampening of the neural representations of the expected stimulus as learning progresses. In this study we aim to test this theory and shed light on the dynamics of expectation effects, both at single trial level and over time. Thirty-one participants completed a statistical learning task consisting of paired scene categories whereby a “leading” image from one category is quickly followed by a “trailing” image from a different category. Multivariate EEG analyses focussed on decoding stimulus information related to the trailing image category. Within-trial, decoding analyses showed that stimulus expectation increased decoding accuracy at early latencies and decreased decoding accuracy at later latencies, in line with OPT. However, across trials, stimulus expectation decreased decoding accuracy in initial trials and increased decoding accuracy in later trials. We theorise that these dissociable dynamics of expectation effects within and across trials can be explained in the context of hierarchical learning mechanisms. Our single trial results provide evidence for the OPT, while our results over time suggest that sharpening and dampening effects emerge at different stages of learning.

Learning about Expectation Violation from Prediction Error Paradigms – A Meta-Analysis on Brain Processes Following a Prediction Error

Predictors of Coping With Expectation Violation: An Integrative Review

Violation of expectation: neural correlates reflect bases of prediction

Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action

Review. The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors

Electrophysiological correlates of prediction formation in anticipation of reward‐ and punishment‐related feedback signals

Believing is achieving - On the role of treatment expectation in neurofeedback applications

Neural Substrates of Updating the Prediction Through Prediction Error During Decision Making.

The Role of the Striatum in Aversive Learning and Aversive Prediction Errors

The Event-Related Potentials Responding to Outcome Valence and Expectancy Violation During Feedback Processing

Dissociable dynamic effects of expectation during statistical learning

Electrophysiological Responses to Expectancy Violations in Semantic and Gambling Tasks: A Comparison of Different EEG Reference Approaches

The Causes and Consequences of Drifting Expectations

Aversive anticipations modulate electrocortical correlates of decision-making and reward reversal learning, but not behavioral performance

An ERP Study of Expectation Violation in a Social Comparison Context

Expectation generation and its effect on subsequent pain and visual perception

Affective prediction errors in persistence and escalation of aggression.

Prediction-error-dependent processing of immediate and delayed positive feedback

The neural dynamics of positive and negative expectations of pain

The role of cognitive reappraisal and expectations in dealing with social feedback.

Dynamic Feedback Between Antidepressant Placebo Expectancies and Mood