Abstract:Previous studies have shown that outcome evaluation is sensitive to social influences. However, it remains unknown whether the consistency of choice between self and others also affect the outcome evaluation. To gain more insight in this research area, we designed two experiments in the present study, in which two participants (a real participant and a confederate) completed a gambling task together. In this task, the real participant chose from two options before/after the confederate made his/her choice. The outcomes of their choices revealed after both of their choices were made. According to the choosing scenario, 2 conditions were considered in the present study for both taking the same (consistent choices) or different options (inconsistent choices). Sixteen (7 males, 20.40 ± 1.11 y) and twenty (10 males, 22.21 ± 1.70 y) healthy adults participated in the experiment 1 and 2, respectively. With normal or corrected to normal vision, none of them reported any history of neurological diseases or brain injuries. Participants were asked to perform a gambling task in collaboration with another participant. By taking turns to choose one from two covered cards, they won 50 or 0 RMB depending on their choosing consistency. In the experiment 1, the confederate chose first while in the experiment 2 the real participant chose first. After both of them made their choices and were informed with the other's choice, the outcome were revealed, which fell in 4 categories of (i) both chose the same card and both won; (ii) both chose the same option and both lost; (iii) they chose different cards and the real participant won; and (iv) they chose different cards and the real participant lost. ERP results showed that in the early stage of outcome evaluation, no matter who chose first, a more pronounced dFRN was associated with participants taking the same option than taking different options. In the later stage of outcome evaluation, only in experiment 2, increased P3 and LPP were observed when their choices were the same than different. Our data suggests that the consistency of choices between self and other does modulate the neural activity of outcome evaluation. Specifically, in the early stage, consistent choices amplified the neural response to negative outcome as indicated by the enlarged dFRN. In the later stage, when the participant made the choice first and saw the other chose a different option, this inconsistency would trigger a sense of conflict, leading to more mental processes to avoid it later. This effect reflected in the enlarged amplitudes of P3 and LPP. Our finding provides some insights into how social context influences the psychophysiological processes of outcome evaluation.

Hey, What is Your Choice? Uncertainty and Inconsistency Enhance Subjective Anticipation of Upcoming Information in a Social Context

Self-affirmation Enhances the Processing of Uncertainty: an Event-Related Potential Study.

Differential Effects of Uncertainty on LPP Responses to Emotional Events During Explicit and Implicit Anticipation

Ambiguity Attitudes over Time

The Hierarchical Sensitivity to Social Misalignment During Decision-Making under Uncertainty

Uncertain is Worse

Hope for the best when the result is uncertain: high uncertainty induces greater SPN amplitudes than low uncertainty

Distinct computational mechanisms of uncertainty processing explain opposing exploratory behaviors in anxiety and apathy

Uncertainty-modulated attentional capture: Outcome variance increases attentional priority.

Ambiguity Preference in Waiting Time: Investigating the Desirability Effect and the Interplay of Temporal Description, Outcome Category, and Evaluation Mode

Uncertain is worse: modulation of anxiety on pain anticipation by intensity uncertainty: evidence from the ERP study.

Restoring Meaning: Self-uncertainty Increases Subjective Distance Between the Past and Present Self

Uncertainty avoidance versus conditioned reinforcement: exploring paradoxical choice in rats

Uncertainty cues amplify late positive potential responses to aversive emotional stimuli

Temporal Patterns of Pleasant and Unpleasant Affect Following Uncertain Decision-making

Consistency of Choice Modulates Outcome Evaluation:Evidence from ERP Studies

Neural Dynamics and Coupling Underlying Uncertain Anticipatory Conflicts in Anxious Individuals

How previous experience shapes future affective subjective ratings: A follow-up study investigating implicit learning and cue ambiguity

EXPRESS: Uncertain World: How Children’s Curiosity and Intolerance of Uncertainty Relate to their Behaviour and Emotion under Uncertainty.

Understanding the Role of Consumer Heterogeneity in the Formation of Satisfaction Uncertainty

Study of Impacts from Regret and Uncertainty on Consumer Choice