Decision Reversibility and Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Counterfactual Thinking and Anticipated Regret
Xiao Li,Jing Ye,Mianlin Deng,Xudong Zhao,Wendian Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S364548
IF: 3.974
2022-08-14
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Xiao Li, 1, 2 Jing Ye, 1 Mianlin Deng, 1 Xudong Zhao, 1 Wendian Shi 1 1 Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Society & Culture, Party School of Ningxia Committee of C.P.C, Yinchuan, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Wendian Shi, Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, No. 100 Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200234, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 21 64323104, Email Purpose: Extensive research has shown that reversible decisions yield lower post-decision satisfaction than irreversible decisions. However, to date, little is known about how decision reversibility affects post-decision satisfaction. Based on regret theory, this study aimed to examine the mediating role of counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret in the association between decision reversibility and satisfaction. Methods: In this study (130 participants), participants were randomly assigned to two personnel decision situations with reversible and irreversible decision outcomes, and all participants completed questionnaires during the process of completing the decision task. The questionnaires used included the Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale, Anticipated Regret Scale, and satisfaction questionnaire. Finally, the data were statistically analyzed using the base package in R and PROCESS 3.5. Results: The results show that (1) Compared to irreversible decisions, reversible decisions have a significant negative impact on satisfaction. (2) Counterfactual thinking plays a mediating role between decision reversibility and satisfaction. (3) Compared with irreversible decisions, reversible decisions further lowered the level of post-decision satisfaction through the chain mediating effects of counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret. Conclusion: People's lowered levels of post-decision satisfaction in the reversible decision condition relate to increased levels of counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret. In addition, counterfactual thinking can play a mediating role alone, indicating that this variable may be critical in understanding the mechanisms by which decision reversibility affects satisfaction. This knowledge may be used to help people optimize their decision-making behavior. Keywords: decision reversibility, satisfaction, regret theory, counterfactual thinking, anticipated regret Imagine you go shopping at the mall and there are two identical goods for you to select; would you choose the one with an additional returnable policy attached (reversible decision) or the non-returnable one (non-reversible decision)? Generally, one's intuition will lead them toward an immediate preference for reversibility, sometimes even a willingness to pay a premium for this privilege. 1 However, these studies showed results that challenge this general intuition: reversible decisions actually yielded lower levels of post-decision satisfaction and higher levels of regret than irreversible decisions. 1–3 This is considered to be a general understanding in the field of decision making. In this context, one questions emerge: how do reversible decisions lead to a lower level of post-decision satisfaction? To probe this effect, we propose a chain mediation theory model with counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret as mediating variables. Regret theory provides a theoretical framework for the reversible decision effect from the perspective of cognitive and emotional chain reactions. 4 According to regret theory, to avoid regret, people invariably tend to compare their chosen option with the rejected option after making their initial choice under reversible conditions (before the final choice) and imagine whether a different choice would have been better. 5 Such cognitive comparisons are also known as counterfactual thinking, 5,6 and through these comparisons people develop feelings of regret based on expectations, that is, anticipated regret. 7,8 Furthermore, regret theory indicates that the course from counterfactual thinking to anticipated regret can make objectively better outcomes look worse, ultimately impairing people's satisfaction with the decision outcome. 9,10 Under the irreversibility condition (no opportunity to choose again), combined with information search theory, 11 we suggest that people will tend to turn off or inhibit information that is relevant to the decision or search for information that is consistent with the decision outcome, to support the decision made in order to avoid regret. 6 Compared to reversible deci -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary