Abstract:Constructed-response (CR) questions are a mainstay of introductory physics textbooks and exams. However, because of time, cost, and scoring reliability constraints associated with this format, CR questions are being increasingly replaced by multiple-choice (MC) questions in formal exams. The integrated testlet (IT) is a recently-developed question structure designed to provide a proxy of the pedagogical advantages of CR questions while procedurally functioning as set of MC questions. ITs utilize an answer-until-correct response format that provides immediate confirmatory or corrective feedback, and they thus allow not only for the granting of partial credit in cases of initially incorrect reasoning, but furthermore the ability to build cumulative question structures. Here, we report on a study that directly compares the functionality of ITs and CR questions in introductory physics exams. To do this, CR questions were converted to concept-equivalent ITs, and both sets of questions were deployed in midterm and final exams. We find that both question types provide adequate discrimination between stronger and weaker students, with CR questions discriminating slightly better than the ITs. Meanwhile, an analysis of inter-rater scoring of the CR questions raises serious concerns about the reliability of the granting of partial credit when this traditional assessment technique is used in a realistic (but non optimized) setting. Furthermore, we show evidence that partial credit is granted in a valid manner in the ITs. Thus, together with consideration of the vastly reduced costs of administering IT-based examinations compared to CR-based examinations, our findings indicate that ITs are viable replacements for CR questions in formal examinations where it is desirable to both assess concept integration and to reward partial knowledge, while efficiently scoring examinations.

Coupled Multiple-response vs. Free-response Conceptual assessment: An Example from upper-division Physics

Validation and analysis of the coupled multiple response Colorado upper-division electrostatics (CUE) diagnostic

Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism

Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades

Development and Uses of Upper-division Conceptual Assessment

Can Free-Response Questions Be Approximated by Multiple-Choice Equivalents?

A comparison of integrated testlet and constructed-response question formats

Conceptual Assessment Tool for Advanced Undergraduate Electrodynamics

Complex multiple-choice questions are inequitable for low-income and domestic students (and difficult for everyone)

Online test administration results in students selecting more responses to multiple-choice-multiple-response items

Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University

Assessing Student Learning in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics/Math Methods

Applying Unidimensional and Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models in Testlet-Based Reading Assessment

Lessons from a Large-Scale Assessment: Results from Free Response Pre- and Post-testing in Electricity and Magnetism

Overview of couplet scoring in content-focused physics assessments

Evaluating Different Scoring Methods for Multiple Response Items Providing Partial Credit

Assessing Learning Outcomes in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument

Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic

Utility of a multimodal computer-based assessment format for assessment with a higher degree of reliability and validity

Applying Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Mechanics Concept Inventories

Comparing student performance on a multi-attempt asynchronous assessment to a single-attempt synchronous assessment in introductory level physics