Abstract:The research presented in this thesis was motivated by the need to improve introductory physics courses. Introductory physics courses are generally the first courses in which students learn to create models to solve complex problems. However, many students taking introductory physics courses fail to acquire a command of the concepts, methods and tools presented in these courses. The reforms proposed by this thesis focus on altering the content of introductory courses rather than content delivery methods as most reforms do. This thesis explores how the performance on a widely used test of conceptual understanding in mechanics compares between students taking a course with updated and modified content and students taking a traditional course. Better performance by traditional students was found to stem from their additional practice on the types of items which appeared on the test. The results of this work brought into question the role of the introductory physics course for non-majors. One aspect of this new role is the teaching of new methods such as computation (the use of a computer to solve numerically, simulate and visualize physical problems). This thesis explores the potential benefits for students who learn computation as part of physics course. After students worked through a suite of computational homework problems, many were able to model a new physical situation with which they had no experience. The failure of some students to model this new situation might have stemmed from their unfavorable attitudes towards learning computation. In this thesis, we present the development of a new tool for characterizing students' attitudes. Preliminary measurements indicated significant differences between successful and unsuccessful students.

Assessing Student Learning in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics/Math Methods

Assessing Learning Outcomes in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument

Development and Uses of Upper-division Conceptual Assessment

Validation and analysis of the coupled multiple response Colorado upper-division electrostatics (CUE) diagnostic

Conceptual Assessment Tool for Advanced Undergraduate Electrodynamics

Rubric Design for Separating the Roles of Open-Ended Assessments

Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University

Extending and Evaluating and Novel Course Reform of introductory Mechanics

Development and Validation of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Experimental Physics

Lessons from a Large-Scale Assessment: Results from Free Response Pre- and Post-testing in Electricity and Magnetism

Applying Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Mechanics Concept Inventories

What are we assessing? An analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics

Student performance analysis of virtual introductory calculus-based physics class

Development and results from a survey on students views of experiments in lab classes and research

The Design and Validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey

Assessing Students' Computational Thinking In A Learning By Modeling Environment

Coupled Multiple-response vs. Free-response Conceptual assessment: An Example from upper-division Physics

Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism

Student-Created Physics Problems as an Independent and Equitable Assessment Tool

Assessing Scientific Practices in Physics Paper-based Assessments

Extending positive C-LASS results across multiple instructors and multiple classes of Modeling Instruction