Abstract:Instruction is unlikely to be effective if instructors do not know the common alternate conceptions of introductory physics students and explicitly take into account common student difficulties in their instructional design. Here, we discuss research involving the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) to evaluate one aspect of the pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants (TAs): knowledge of introductory students' alternate conceptions in electricity and magnetism as revealed by the CSEM. For each item on the CSEM, the TAs were asked to identify the most common incorrect answer choice selected by introductory physics students if they did not know the correct answer after traditional instruction. Then, we used introductory student CSEM post-test data to assess the extent to which TAs were able to identify the most common alternate conception of introductory students in each question on the CSEM. We find that the TAs were thoughtful when attempting to identify common student difficulties and they enjoyed learning about student difficulties this way. However, they struggled to identify many common difficulties of introductory students that persist after traditional instruction. We discuss specific alternate conceptions that persist after traditional instruction, the extent to which TAs were able to identify them, and results from think-aloud interviews with TAs which provided valuable information regarding why the TAs sometimes selected certain alternate conceptions as the most common but were instead very rare among introductory students. We also discuss how tasks such as the one used in this study can be used in professional development programs to engender productive discussions about the importance of being knowledgeable about student alternate conceptions in order to help students learn.

Conceptual Assessment Tool for Advanced Undergraduate Electrodynamics

Validation and analysis of the coupled multiple response Colorado upper-division electrostatics (CUE) diagnostic

Development and Uses of Upper-division Conceptual Assessment

Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism

Assessing Student Learning in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics/Math Methods

Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University

Assessing Learning Outcomes in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument

Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic

Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels

Coupled Multiple-response vs. Free-response Conceptual assessment: An Example from upper-division Physics

Development and Validation of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Experimental Physics

Lessons from a Large-Scale Assessment: Results from Free Response Pre- and Post-testing in Electricity and Magnetism

Development and results from a survey on students views of experiments in lab classes and research

Re-thinking the Rubric for Grading the CUE: The Superposition Principle

Exploring one aspect of pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism

A longitudinal study of student conceptual understanding in Electricity and Magnetism

Teaching assistants' performance at identifying common introductory student difficulties revealed by the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism

Using the Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels

An epistemology and expectations survey about experimental physics: Development and initial results

Online Examination and Self-Assessment Tool for EM Teaching

Developing Assessments of Content Knowledge for Teaching Using Evidence-centered Design