Abstract:Real-life and work-related situations of the 21st century present complex problems that require graduates to possess the skills to solve problems in challenging and unfamiliar arenas. Students must therefore have the skills to deal with a wide range of problems. Unfortunately, most students struggle to apply their learning to novel problem-solving situations regardless of their self-efficacy beliefs. It appears particularly significant to investigate this phenomenon in the context of physics education. Using a mixed-methods design within a collaborative learning environment (CLE), this study investigated the factors that influence students’ self-efficacy in solving conceptual mathematical problems in physics. The primary data sources were the science problem solving questionnaire (SPSQ), the self-efficacy rating scale (SERS), and two semi-structured interview items. The results of multi-level regression and descriptive data analysis revealed students’ self-efficacy in solving conceptual mathematical problems in physics (β=.16, p<.01, SE=.065). Among all the self-efficacy variables (e.g., mastery experience, vicarious experience, physical arousal, anxiety, and gender), mastery experiences composed the largest amount of unique variance between male and female students (36% and 21%). The regression coefficient showed a significant difference between male (β=.13, p<.01, SE=.02) and female (β=.34, p<.01, SE=.07). Female students reported slightly higher levels of anxiety (3%) than male students (2%) when completing the SPSQ. In terms of physiological states, females reported 7% and males 1%. The results also showed a strong positive relationship between the instructional approach and student performance (r=.86, p<.001). One major implication of this study is that science educators could include appropriate instruction in delivering content courses to potentially support student teachers at the beginning of their science education studies.

Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University

Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic

Validation and analysis of the coupled multiple response Colorado upper-division electrostatics (CUE) diagnostic

Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism

Lessons from a Large-Scale Assessment: Results from Free Response Pre- and Post-testing in Electricity and Magnetism

Re-thinking the Rubric for Grading the CUE: The Superposition Principle

Conceptual Assessment Tool for Advanced Undergraduate Electrodynamics

Assessing Student Learning in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics/Math Methods

Assessing Learning Outcomes in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument

Development and Uses of Upper-division Conceptual Assessment

Facilitating Problem Solving in a University Undergraduate Physics Classroom: The Case of Students’ Self-Efficacy

Coupled Multiple-response vs. Free-response Conceptual assessment: An Example from upper-division Physics

Upper-division Student Understanding of Coulomb's Law: Difficulties with Continuous Charge Distributions

Probing university students' understanding of electromotive force in electricity

Student Difficulties with Boundary Conditions in Electrodynamics

Assessing Confidence and Certainty of Students in an Undergraduate Linear Algebra Course

Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels

Student understanding of symmetry and Gauss's law of electricity

Efficacy of a hybrid take home and in class summative assessment for the postsecondary physics classroom

Identifying Differences In Diagnostic Skills Between Physics Students: Developing A Rubric

Identifying Differences in Diagnostic Skills between Physics Students: Students' Self-Diagnostic Performance Given Alternative Scaffolding