Abstract:This paper aims to compare the cost-effectiveness between command-control and market instruments in addressing non-point source pollution. By definition, non-point source pollution (NPSP) is extremely difficult to observe individual level discharge and thus, very hard to implement market incentive policies. Few observational studies examine the cost effectiveness of NPSP policies because it is difficult to study how individual polluters respond to pecuniary incentives to abate. I exploit a policy setting where agricultural runoff is in fact, a point source pollution but is regulated as if it were NPSP which allows the study of abatement behavior in what is typically a NPSP setting. I study a program called the Florida Everglades Forever Act intended to reduce phosphorus runoffs from entering the sensitive Everglades ecosystem. The program consists of both a command-control component as well as a market incentive component which I am able to disentangle using a new dataset I developed on annual farm level discharge and subsidies for pollution reduction. The dataset allows the use of the two-step Arellano-Bond estimator to estimate a marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve for the average farm. Using the estimated MAC curve, I simulate the costs under the market mechanism and compare that with both data-estimated and engineer-estimated costs under command-control. I find that to achieve the same benchmark pollution outcome, the market mechanism would reduce compliance cost by 20%. 1 Keywords— Non-point Source, Pollution, Agricultural Runoff, Ambient Tax, Ambient Subsidy Suggested Referees— Kathy Segerson (kathleen.segerson@uconn.edu), Jason Shogren (jramses@uwyo.edu), Till Requate (requate@economics.uni-kiel.de), Don Fullerton (dfullert@illinois.edu), Alvin Murphy (alvin.murphy@asu.edu)

The effectiveness of incomplete and overlapping pollution regulation: Evidence from bans on phosphate in automatic dishwasher detergent

The Misallocation Cost of Inefficient Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China

Impacts of Environmental Regulation on Water Pollution Enterprises in China: an Empirical Study Based on "two Control Zones" Policy

Costs of an Environmental Regulation in Livestock Farming: Evidence from Pig Production in Rural China

Command-Control Versus Market Incentive Policies for Non-point Source Pollution

Pollution-induced regulation substitution

State-level regulation of disinfection byproducts in the United States

Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers

Can China's Government-Oriented Environmental Regulation Reduce Water Pollution? Evidence from Water Pollution Intensive Firms

Unsynchronised Legislation and Unintended Pollution: Estimating Regulation-Induced Substitution in China

Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation

Coordination or contradiction: Evidence from water and air pollution regulation in China

Can China’s Government-Oriented Environmental Regulation Reduce Water Pollution? Evidence from Water Pollution Intensive Firms

Environmental policy behavioral spillovers: The impact of California's single‐use carryout bag ban on the use of unregulated single‐use plastics

Too little or too much? Exploring the effectiveness of different policies in air pollution control from technical and non-technical pathways

Policy Implementation Inconsistency and Emission Leakage: Evidence from The Closure of Polluting Firms

Why is COD Pollution from Chinese Manufacturing Declining?--the Role of Environmental Regulation

The Effects of Mandatory Pollution Abatement on Corporate Investment and Performance: Theory and Evidence from a U.S. Regulation

Political Decoupling: Private Implementation of Public Policy

Reversing Property Rights: Practice‐Based Approaches for Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint‐source Water Pollution When Emissions Aggregate Nonlinearly

Polluting Thy Neighbor: Unintended Consequences of China׳s Pollution Reduction Mandates