Abstract:Several countries have imposed either a ban or a tax on single-use plastic packaging, motivated by their contribution to marine plastic pollution. This may lead consumers to opt for similar unregulated substitutes, potentially undermining or even counteracting the intended effect of the policy instrument. The purpose of this study is to theoretically and empirically compare the environmental and welfare effects of the first-best Pigouvian taxes on both plastic bags and a substitute (paper bags), with two alternative second-best policy instruments: a tax on plastic products alone, and a common uniform tax on all packaging materials. The empirical analysis accounts for two different types of environmental externalities from the use of both bag types: marine pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. It also compares results for two countries, Denmark and the USA, which differ in the demand for plastic and paper bags. The theoretical analysis shows that a unilateral tax on plastic bags should equal the marginal environmental damage of plastic bags minus a fraction of the marginal environmental cost of paper bags, hence being lower than the Pigouvian tax. The optimal common tax should equal a weighted average of the marginal environmental damage of the two bag types and would be lower than the Pigouvian tax on plastics if the marginal external cost of plastic bags exceeds that for paper bags. The empirical analysis shows that for default parameters, the variation in tax level across the studied scenarios is small. It also shows that if Pigouvian taxes cannot be implemented, a common uniform tax on both bag types would result in a higher welfare gain than a tax on plastic bags alone. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the level of the second-best taxes and their associated environmental and welfare impacts are sensitive to assumptions regarding the littering rate and decay rate of plastic bags in the marine environment.

Environmental policy behavioral spillovers: The impact of California's single‐use carryout bag ban on the use of unregulated single‐use plastics

Goodbye Plastic Bags? Lessons from the Shopping Plastic Bag Ban in Chile

Single-use plastic bag alternatives result in higher environmental impacts: Multi-regional analysis in country with uneven waste management

Spillover in the context of forced behaviour change: observations from a naturalistic time-series study

Towards Sustainable Cities: The Spillover Effects of Waste-Sorting Policies on Sustainable Consumption

Pro-environmental spillover under environmental appeals and monetary incentives: Evidence from an intervention study on household waste separation

The Crowding-Out Effects Of Garbage Fees And Voluntary Source Separation Programs On Waste Reduction: Evidence From China

Spillover of different regulatory policies for waste sorting: Potential influence on energy-saving policy acceptability

Social Cognitive Theory and Reciprocal Relationship: A Guide to Single-Use Plastic Education for Policymakers, Business Leaders and Consumers

Effect of China's Import Ban on Plastic Waste Trade of the U.S. Fifty States

Spillover Effects of Household Waste Separation Policy on Electricity Consumption: Evidence from Hangzhou, China

Can’t Hurt, Might Help: Examining the Spillover Effects From Purposefully Adopting a New Pro-Environmental Behavior

Plastic bag legislation in the United States: influential factors on its creation

Spillover effect of congestion charging on pro-environmental behavior

Do Mandatory Environmental Policies Really Work? A Case Study Of California'S Mandatory Commercial Recycling Law

Environmental taxation of plastic bags and substitutes: Balancing marine pollution and climate change

Effectiveness of intervention on behaviour change against use of non-biodegradable plastic bags: a systematic review

The Environmental Impact of Plastic Grocery Bags and Their Alternatives

China's Plastic Import Ban Increases Prospects of Environmental Impact Mitigation of Plastic Waste Trade Flow Worldwide.

Behavior Strategy Analysis Based on the Multi-Stakeholder Game under the Plastic Straw Ban in China

China’s plastic import ban increases prospects of environmental impact mitigation of plastic waste trade flow worldwide