Longer Travel Distance Associated With Decreased Outpatient Follow Up And Increased Mortality Post-hospitalization For HF

Eva Bugos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.270
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Introduction Geographic disparities in access to healthcare are linked to patient outcomes and healthcare utilization for many diseases. Geographic disparities may particularly impact HF outcomes because follow up after HF hospitalization is time-sensitive. Alternatively, the emergence of telemedicine may attenuate the magnitude of such associations. Hypothesis After index hospitalization for HF, patients who travel shorter distances to reach cardiology services are more likely to follow up within 14 days of discharge and have lower 24-month mortality. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) hospitals with primary diagnosis of HF from 2010-2023, limited to 27,097 index HF hospitalizations associated with in-person cardiology visit within 1 year of discharge and complete follow up data. Straight line distance was calculated between patients’ home and cardiology practice used for follow up. Outcomes were odds of 14 day post-discharge follow up using piecewise logistic regression with breakpoint at 30 miles, and odds of 24 month mortality using logistic regression. Results Of 27,097 index hospitalizations, 6347 (23%) had either in-person or telemedicine follow up within 14 days. Patients traveled average 11.8 (SD 36.8) miles for general cardiology follow-up and 17.7 (SD 34.0) miles for follow up with a HF subspecialist. Only 4,072 (15%) of patients went to the cardiology practice closest to their home. 14-day follow up had a non-linear association with distance. Under 30 miles, distance was positively associated with 14-day follow up; for each additional mile, patients had 1.01 odds of follow up (aOR=1.01, 1.00-1.01) . For distance greater than 30 miles, distance had a negative association with 14-day follow up (aOR=0.99, 0.98-0.99). Mortality had a positive linear association with distance; for each additional 10 miles of distance, odds of mortality were 1.04 higher (aOR 1.04, 1.01-1.05). Conclusion Patients traveled long distances to access care and many bypassed a closer provider for one further away. Under 30 miles, patients who lived further away were more likely to follow up, even after controlling for geographic covariates like area deprivation and neighborhood walk scores. This may reflect patient choice; patients living near multiple providers may select one further away based on personal preference. After 30 miles, distance may limit choice of provider and ability to follow up promptly. Efforts to increase post-discharge follow up may benefit from focus on expanding access for patients who live far away from cardiology providers.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?