HF Subspecialty Follow Up Associated With Increased GDMT Prescribing Regardless Of Telemedicine Vs In-Person Visit

Eva Bugos,Jenna Skowronski,Jianhui Zhu,Floyd Thoma,Jen Kliner,Brittany Palmer,James Coons,Gavin Hickey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.242

IF: 6.592

2024-01-01

Journal of Cardiac Failure

Abstract:Introduction Recent research recognizes that HF hospitalization and early weeks post-discharge are key periods for GDMT initiation and up-titration. Given its time-sensitive nature, post-discharge care is increasingly being conducted via telemedicine. However, it is unclear if and how telemedicine differs from in-person care. A recent study found that outpatient cardiology providers are less likely to order diagnostic tests or prescribe several GDMT classes during telemedicine visits for HF. Understanding GDMT prescribing practices during telemedicine visits may help improve post-discharge HF care. Hypothesis After hospitalization for HF, patients with HFrEF who have telemedicine follow up have no difference in GDMT prescription patterns compared to those with in-person follow up. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with primary diagnosis of heart failure admitted within one hospital system; analysis limited to those with LVEF<=35% and discharge during time period when telemedicine was available (March 2020-February 2023). Initial follow up visits were categorized as in-person cardiology, telemedicine cardiology, in-person HF subspecialty, telemedicine HF subspecialty, in-person general medicine, or telemedicine general medicine. Patients’ GDMT score is the sum of GDMT classes with at least one prescription for a medication in that class (range 0-4) at hospital discharge and 3 months post-discharge. Results Of 6,363 index hospitalizations with LVEF<=35% and discharge after March 1 2020, 4,166 hospitalizations had initial post-discharge follow up visit within one year: 1162 (28%) in-person cardiology, 317 (8%) telemedicine cardiology, 98 (2%) HF subspecialty in person, 41 (1%) HF subspecialty telemedicine, 2109 (51%) in-person general medicine, and 439 (10%) telemedicine general medicine. Patients were prescribed average 1.5 GDMT classes at discharge. Compared to in-person cardiology follow up, telemedicine cardiology follow up had fewer prescribed GDMT classes at discharge (aOR=0.79, p-value=0.05) and 3 months (aOR 0.72, p-value=0.02). HF subspecialty follow up had no difference in GDMT classes at discharge but in-person visits were more likely to start new GDMT in the first 3 months after discharge (aOR 1.9, p<0.01) and were on more GDMT classes at 3 months (aOR 1.8, p<0.01). Patients with no follow up were prescribed less GDMT at 3 months (aOR=0.40, p<0.01) and were more likely to discontinue GDMT (aOR 2.8, p<0.01). Conclusion Patients with HFrEF are frequently discharged without optimization of GDMT. While type of visit was not associated with titration of GDMT, patients following with HF subspecialists were more likely to start new GDMT within the first 3 months of follow up.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems