Have We Made Progress In Prescribing GDMT For HFrEF In The Real World?: Comparison Of Practice From A Large Integrated US Healthcare System To The Published Literature

Zafer Sattouf,Colin R. Juran,Michael A. Adornetto,Eiran Z. Gorodeski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.274
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Introduction Registries published in the US describe significant gaps in use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There have been significant efforts to close these gaps at the national level, including via publication of HF guidelines by various medical societies. The purpose of our study was to characterize the prescription of GDMT for this population of patients within the University Hospitals Health System (UHHS), a large integrated healthcare system with 17 hospitals and over 150 locations throughout northeast Ohio. Nationally representative data from the CHAMP-HF registry was used for comparison. Methods We constructed a registry of patients with HFrEF within UHHS via an EMR data pull. We included patients with an LVEF≤40% who were seen in any ambulatory clinic in our healthcare system between 2019-2023, were alive at time of our data pull, and who were at least on one GDMT drug. This was a similar approach to the one used in the CHAMP-HF registry. HFrEF-specific medications were categorized into classes (guideline-directed beta-blockers [BB], neurohormonal antagonists including ACEI/ARNI/ARB [NHA], mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRA], and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors [SGLT2i]). We performed an additional analysis of SGLT2i prescriptions and compared it to SGLT2i use in patients with DM and HFrEF from the original CHAMP-HF registry. Results We identified 5665 patients with HFrEF who met our enrollment criteria. Mean age was 69±14 years, mean EF was 31±8%. We found that 82% were on a BB, 80% patients were on a NHA and 41% were on MRA, compared to 67%, 73%, 33%, respectively, in the CHAMP-HF registry. Among patients eligible for all three medications, 31% were on this regimen, compared to 22% in CHAMP-HF. Among patients with GFR>30, 13.3% were on SGLT2i, compared to 2% in CHAMP-HF. In an additional analysis we found that 6.4% of eligible patients were on all four GDMT classes. Conclusion Despite residual gaps in the prescription of GDMT for patients with HFrEF, the proportion of patients prescribed appropriate therapy has improved as compared to a nationally representative registry from the published literature.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?