Impact Of Covid-19 Pandemic And Expansion Of Telemedicine On Palliative Care Utilization Among Patients Admitted With Heart Failure

Aleesha Kainat,Bradley Very,Ahmet Sezer,Floyd Thoma,Gavin Hickey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.175
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Introduction The 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines recommend integration of palliative care (PC) in heart failure (HF) management. Despite these recommendations, palliative care (PC) utilization remains suboptimal. It remains unclear how the evolution of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted PC delivery for the HF population. We sought to evaluate trends in telemedicine and in-person PC visits in the HF population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hypothesis We hypothesize that there was a rise in PC telemedicine utilization for the HF population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Retrospective cross-sectional observational analysis of 73,074 patients with HF admitted between 2017 and 2022. Patients were divided into two cohorts (Cohort A and B) pre-COVID-19 era (2017-2019) (A) and post-COVID-19 era (January 2020-2022) (B). Demographic variables including age, race, sex, income, proximity to tertiary care center (TCC), and insurance types are presented as a percentage derived by the Chi-squared test, and numerical variables Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), ceased to breathe (CTB) are presented as mean and standard deviation derived by the t-test. Results PCC utilization decreased from 4.01% in 2019 to 0.87% in 2022. We saw a general rise in tele-PCC utilization during the pandemic, with peak utilization of 1.42% in 2020 compared to 0% in 2017, with a decline to 0.98 % in 2022 (Figure.1). For Tele PCC utilization between the two cohorts (A and B) we saw a rise in utilization most notably in elderly (age >75 years) (1 (3.45%) vs 37 (14.68%)), white population (18 (62.07%) vs 189 (75.00%)), proximity to TCC (<10 miles) (11 (37.93%) vs 113 (44.84%)), low-income households (<50K) (13 (44.83%) vs 134 (53.17%)). For PCC utilization, between the two cohorts (A and B) we saw utilization was higher in the middle age group (age >50 and <75 years) (327 (22.95%) vs 196 (28.99%)), high income group (> 100K) (67 (4.70%) vs 34 (5.03%)) and those farther from TCC (>20 miles) (111 (7.79%) vs 62 (9.17%)). Conclusions There was a rise in utilization of tele PCC in HF patients over time from 2017-2022. Perhaps, telemedicine may serve as a successful tool in future to eliminate the gap that exists in PCC utilization in HF patients, however, warrants further study.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?