Palliative care and COVID-19: acknowledging past mistakes to forge a better future
Camila Rabelo Monteiro de Andrade,Fernanda Silva Trindade Luz,Neimy Ramos de Oliveira,Luciane Kopittke,Luiza Marinho Motta Santa Rosa,Angelica Gomides dos Reis Gomes,Frederico Bartolazzi,Saionara Cristina Francisco,Felicio Roberto da Costa,Alzira de Oliveira Jorge,Christiane Corrêa Rodrigues Cimini,Marcelo Carneiro,Karen Brasil Ruschel,Alexandre Vargas Schwarzbold,Daniela Ponce,Maria Angélica Pires Ferreira,Milton Henriques Guimarães Júnior,Daniel Vitório Silveira,Fernando Graça Aranha,Rafael Lima Rodrigues de Carvalho,Mariana Frizzo de Godoy,Lucas Macedo Pereira Viana,Vânia Naomi Hirakata,Maria Aparecida Camargos Bicalho,Milena Soriano Marcolino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1390057
IF: 3.9
2024-07-25
Frontiers in Medicine
Abstract:Context COVID-19 induces complex distress across physical, psychological, and social realms and palliative care (PC) has the potential to mitigate this suffering significantly. Objectives To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with an indication of PC, compared to patients who had no indication, in different pandemic waves. Methods This retrospective multicenter observational cohort included patients from 40 hospitals, admitted from March 2020 to August 2022. Patients who had an indication of palliative care (PC) described in their medical records were included in the palliative care group (PCG), while those who had no such indication in their medical records were allocated to the non-palliative care group (NPCG). Results Out of 21,158 patients, only 6.7% had indication for PC registered in their medical records. The PCG was older, had a higher frequency of comorbidities, exhibited higher frailty, and had a higher prevalence of clinical complications and mortality (81.4% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001), when compared to the NPCG. Regarding artificial life support, the PCG had a higher frequency of dialysis (20.4% vs. 10.1%, p < 0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation (48.2% vs. 26.0%, p < 0.001) and admission to the intensive care unit (53.6% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001). These differences were consistent across all three waves. Conclusion A low proportion of patients received PC. Patients in PCG were more fragile, had more clinical complications, and had a higher mortality. On the contrary to our expectations, they received more artificial life support in all three waves. Taken together, these findings suggest that decisions regarding PC indication were made too late, within a context of end-of-life and therapeutic failure.
medicine, general & internal