Abstract:Many suggestions for dealing with the so-called replication crisis in psychology revolve around the idea that better and more complex statistical-mathematical tools or stricter procedures are required in order to obtain reliable findings and prevent cheating or publication biases. While these aspects may play an exacerbating role, we interpret the replication crisis primarily as an epistemological crisis in psychology caused by an inadequate fit between the ontic nature of the psyche and the quantitative approach. On the basis of the philosophers of science Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, and Imre Lakatos we suggest that the replication crisis is therefore a symptom of a fundamental problem in psychology, but at the same time it is also an opportunity to advance psychology as a science. In a first step, against the background of Popper's Critical Rationalism, the replication crisis is interpreted as an opportunity to eliminate inaccurate theories from the pool of theories and to correct problematic developments. Continuing this line of thought, in an interpretation along the lines of Thomas Kuhn, the replication crisis might signify a model drift or even model crisis, thus possibly heralding a new paradigm in psychology. The reasons for this are located in the structure of academic psychology on the basis of Lakatos's assumption about how sciences operate. Accordingly, one hard core that lies at the very basis of psychology may be found in the assumption that the human psyche can and is to be understood in quantitative terms. For this to be possible, the ontic structure of the psyche, i.e., its very nature, must also in some way be quantitatively constituted. Hence, the replication crisis suggests that the ontic structure of the psyche in some way (also) contains a non-quantitative dimension that can only be grasped incompletely or fragmentarily using quantitative research methods. Fluctuating and inconsistent results in psychology could therefore also be the expression of a mismatch between the ontic level of the object of investigation and the epistemic level of the investigation.

Should psychology adopt Bhaskar's critical realist philosophy of science?

Critical realism, psychology, and the crisis of replication: A reply to Haig; Derksen & Morawski; and Trafimow

A psychological perspective of agency and structure within critical realist theory: a specific application to the construct of self-efficacy

Replications are informative, particularly when they fail

Critique of pure Bayesian cognitive science: A view from the philosophy of science

The proxy of Dorian Gray: scientific realism, construct validation and the way forward

Dialectical critical realism, complexity and the psychology of blame

Dialectical critical realism, transformative change and social work

Statistical positivism versus critical scientific realism. A comparison of two paradigms for motivation research: Part 1. A philosophical and empirical analysis of statistical positivism

Integrating Philosophical Perspectives into the Study of Public Administration: the Contribution of Critical Realism to Understanding Public Value

Replicating is difficult but necessary, and methodology can help

Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science or Ideology?

Realistic From Far But Far From Realism: Withering Scientific Realism in the Quantum Case

Seven key insights from critical realism and their implications for ecological thinking and action in community psychology

Critical Realists' Idea of Causality Mechanism

Liberal Bias on Psychology: A Comment on Bartels (2023)

Realists or pragmatists? “Reliable evidence” and the role of the educational psychologist

Problems in AI, their roots in philosophy, and implications for science and society

Moral and Political Foundations: From Political Psychology to Political Realism

The quantitative paradigm and the nature of the human mind. The replication crisis as an epistemological crisis of quantitative psychology in view of the ontic nature of the psyche

Bias in the evaluation of psychology studies: A comparison of parapsychology versus neuroscience