Abstract:Many suggestions for dealing with the so-called replication crisis in psychology revolve around the idea that better and more complex statistical-mathematical tools or stricter procedures are required in order to obtain reliable findings and prevent cheating or publication biases. While these aspects may play an exacerbating role, we interpret the replication crisis primarily as an epistemological crisis in psychology caused by an inadequate fit between the ontic nature of the psyche and the quantitative approach. On the basis of the philosophers of science Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, and Imre Lakatos we suggest that the replication crisis is therefore a symptom of a fundamental problem in psychology, but at the same time it is also an opportunity to advance psychology as a science. In a first step, against the background of Popper's Critical Rationalism, the replication crisis is interpreted as an opportunity to eliminate inaccurate theories from the pool of theories and to correct problematic developments. Continuing this line of thought, in an interpretation along the lines of Thomas Kuhn, the replication crisis might signify a model drift or even model crisis, thus possibly heralding a new paradigm in psychology. The reasons for this are located in the structure of academic psychology on the basis of Lakatos's assumption about how sciences operate. Accordingly, one hard core that lies at the very basis of psychology may be found in the assumption that the human psyche can and is to be understood in quantitative terms. For this to be possible, the ontic structure of the psyche, i.e., its very nature, must also in some way be quantitatively constituted. Hence, the replication crisis suggests that the ontic structure of the psyche in some way (also) contains a non-quantitative dimension that can only be grasped incompletely or fragmentarily using quantitative research methods. Fluctuating and inconsistent results in psychology could therefore also be the expression of a mismatch between the ontic level of the object of investigation and the epistemic level of the investigation.

Critical realism, psychology, and the crisis of replication: A reply to Haig; Derksen & Morawski; and Trafimow

Replications are informative, particularly when they fail

Should psychology adopt Bhaskar's critical realist philosophy of science?

Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology

Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of “Conceptual Replication” and “Direct Replication”

Replicating is difficult but necessary, and methodology can help

The quantitative paradigm and the nature of the human mind. The replication crisis as an epistemological crisis of quantitative psychology in view of the ontic nature of the psyche

Replication and Reproducibility in Cross-Cultural Psychology

Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View

A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology

Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus

The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes

Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial Practices

The Replication Crisis in Psychological Research:The Solution of It

The proxy of Dorian Gray: scientific realism, construct validation and the way forward

Approaching psychology’s current crises by exploring the vagueness of psychological concepts: Recommendations for advancing the discipline.

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

The “replication crisis” and trust in psychological science: How reforms shape public trust in psychology

Are replications mainstream now? A comparison of support for replications expressed in the policies of social psychology journals in 2015 and 2022

A psychological perspective of agency and structure within critical realist theory: a specific application to the construct of self-efficacy

How to Produce, Identify, and Motivate Robust Psychological Science: A Roadmap and a Response to Vize et al.