Abstract:BackgroundWe have previously proposed that trials of social interventions can be done within a “realist” research paradigm. Critics have countered that such trials are irredeemably positivist and asked us to explain our philosophical position.MethodsWe set out to explore what is meant by positivism and whether trials adhere to its tenets (of necessity or in practice) via a narrative literature review of social science and philosophical discussions of positivism, and of the trials literature and three case studies of trials.ResultsThe philosophical literature described positivism as asserting: (1) the epistemic primacy of sensory information; (2) the requirement that theoretical terms equate with empirical terms; (3) the aim of developing universal laws; and (4) the unity of method between natural and social sciences. Regarding (1), it seems that rather than embodying the epistemic primacy of sensory data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions in health embrace an anti-positivist approach aiming to test hypotheses derived deductively from prior theory. Considering (2), while some RCTs of social interventions appear to limit theorisation to concepts with empirical analogues, others examine interventions underpinned by theories engaging with mechanisms and contextual contingencies not all of which can be measured. Regarding (3), while some trialists and reviewers in the health field do limit their role to estimating statistical trends as a mechanistic form of generalisation, this is not an inevitable feature of RCT-based research. Trials of social interventions can instead aim to generalise at the level of theory which specifies how mechanisms are contingent on context. In terms of (4), while RCTs are used to examine biomedical as well as social interventions in health, RCTs of social interventions are often distinctive in using qualitative analyses of data on participant accounts to examine questions of meaning and agency not pursued in the natural sciences.ConclusionWe conclude that the most appropriate paradigm for RCTs of social interventions is realism not positivism.

Statistical positivism versus critical scientific realism. A comparison of two paradigms for motivation research: Part 1. A philosophical and empirical analysis of statistical positivism

The proxy of Dorian Gray: scientific realism, construct validation and the way forward

A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory

A Comparative Analysis on Positivism and Critical Realism in Accounting Research

A psychological perspective of agency and structure within critical realist theory: a specific application to the construct of self-efficacy

Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century

A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts.

The structure and substance of intrinsic motivation

Are randomised controlled trials positivist? Reviewing the social science and philosophy literature to assess positivist tendencies of trials of social interventions in public health and health services

Achievement motivation theory: Balancing precision and utility

Metamotivational beliefs about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.

Reflecting on Motivations: How Reasons to Publish affect Research Behaviour in Astronomy

A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation

The metamotivation approach: Insights into the regulation of motivation and beyond

Revisiting the Self-Determination Theory-Motivating the Unmotivated

The Other Half of the Story: the Role of Social Relationships and Social Contexts in the Development of Academic Motivation

Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.

Embracing the Paradigm Shift from Variable-Based to Case-Based Modeling

An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Intrinsic Motivation in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions

Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory