Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.

Judith M. Harackiewicz,Kenneth E. Barron,Paul R. Pintrich,Andrew J. Elliot,Todd M. Thrash

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638

2002-01-01

Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract:C. Midgley et al. (2001) raised important questions about the effects of performance-approach goals. The present authors disagree with their characterization of the research findings and implications for theory. They discuss 3 reasons to revise goal theory: (a) the importance of separating approach from avoidance strivings, (b) the positive potential of performance-approach goals, and (c) identification of the ways performance-approach goals can combine with mastery goals to promote optimal motivation. The authors review theory and research to substantiate their claim that goal theory is in need of revision, and they endorse a multiple goal perspective. The revision of goal theory is underway and offers a more complex, but necessary, perspective on important issues of motivation, learning, and achievement.

psychology, educational

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the controversy regarding the role and influence of performance - approach goals in the Achievement Goal Theory. Specifically, the authors of the paper believe that:

1. **The importance of distinguishing between approach and avoidance motivation**: Early research usually regarded performance goals as a whole without distinguishing between performance - approach goals and performance - avoidance goals. The authors believe that this distinction is very important because performance - approach goals and performance - avoidance goals are functionally different and lead to different results. Performance - approach goals are usually associated with adaptive results, while performance - avoidance goals are related to maladaptive results.

2. **The positive potential of performance - approach goals**: The authors propose that performance - approach goals have unique positive potential, especially when combined with mastery goals. They believe that performance - approach goals can not only promote academic performance but also complement other positive learning behaviors.

3. **The combination of performance - approach goals and mastery goals**: The authors emphasize that performance - approach goals and mastery goals can be used in combination to promote optimal motivation. They believe that this combination can produce more effective results than a single goal, thus providing a richer perspective for understanding motivation, learning, and achievement.

Overall, this paper aims to revise the existing Achievement Goal Theory. By introducing the distinction between performance - approach goals and performance - avoidance goals and exploring how these goals interact with mastery goals, it provides a more complex but more explanatory theoretical framework. This revision is of great significance for understanding students' motivation, learning, and achievement.