Low intrinsic motivation but not GRIT is predictive of low performing medical students
Robert A. Augustyniak,Justin Chin,Heidi Lujan,Ronald N. Cortright,Stephen E. DiCarlo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.576.46
2017-04-01
The FASEB Journal
Abstract:Many educators contend that, other than intelligence, individual differences in classroom performance are largely accounted for by differential amounts of past and current levels of perseverance of effort (e.g. working hard and long enough). That is, effort/practice account for large individual differences between high and low performing students. Perseverance of effort, it is argued, is the most reasonable explanation for success and supports the “10,000‐hour rule”—it takes 10,000 hours of effort to become a high performer. In contrast, others maintain that intrinsic motivation is the most powerful factor determining performance because individuals are successful when activities are perceived as enjoyable, interesting, and relevant to meeting one's core psychological needs. To address this debate, we administered the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), a multidimensional measurement device developed by Deci and Ryan, to assess our students' interest and enjoyment, perceived choice, perceived competence and relatedness before taking our renal physiology course. We also administered the GRIT survey, which was developed by Duckworth as a measure of perseverance of effort. Only the subscales of the IMI identified low performing students. Thus, intrinsic motivation but not GRIT is predictive of the lowest performing students. We conclude that failure to meet one's core psychological needs, not failure to work hard and long enough leads to poor academic performance.
cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology