The structure and substance of intrinsic motivation

James Y. Shah,Arie W. Kruglanski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012619070-0/50027-1
2000-01-01
Abstract:This chapter discusses the language that has evolved for exploring the intrinsic-motivation phenomena and then goes on to propose a theoretical perspective phrased in terms of this language. The big advantage of the goal language is that it refers to “internal” events or “mental representations,” highly appealing in this “age of cognition” where the person is portrayed as the processor of symbolic information and the constructor of meaning. It is also compatible with the presumed flexibility of the cognitive system, affording a wide heterogeneity of possible goals that depend on culture, personality, and context. The strength of the association between a given goal and means is defined as the likelihood that activation of the given goal will result in the activation of a given means, which increases the likelihood of it being used. The association between a goal and a means is proportional to the degree to which the means has led to goal attainment on prior occasions. According to this model, the degree of perceived association between activity and goal attainment is stronger for intrinsically than for extrinsically motivated activities. This has implications not only for one's overall commitment to goals and activities but also for the degree to which the qualities of one's specific goal pursuit are “transferred” to one's engagement with the activity—that is, the degree to which one's general experiences with engaging in the activity comes to resemble one's general experiences with pursuing the associated goal.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?