Abstract:BackgroundWe have previously proposed that trials of social interventions can be done within a “realist” research paradigm. Critics have countered that such trials are irredeemably positivist and asked us to explain our philosophical position.MethodsWe set out to explore what is meant by positivism and whether trials adhere to its tenets (of necessity or in practice) via a narrative literature review of social science and philosophical discussions of positivism, and of the trials literature and three case studies of trials.ResultsThe philosophical literature described positivism as asserting: (1) the epistemic primacy of sensory information; (2) the requirement that theoretical terms equate with empirical terms; (3) the aim of developing universal laws; and (4) the unity of method between natural and social sciences. Regarding (1), it seems that rather than embodying the epistemic primacy of sensory data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions in health embrace an anti-positivist approach aiming to test hypotheses derived deductively from prior theory. Considering (2), while some RCTs of social interventions appear to limit theorisation to concepts with empirical analogues, others examine interventions underpinned by theories engaging with mechanisms and contextual contingencies not all of which can be measured. Regarding (3), while some trialists and reviewers in the health field do limit their role to estimating statistical trends as a mechanistic form of generalisation, this is not an inevitable feature of RCT-based research. Trials of social interventions can instead aim to generalise at the level of theory which specifies how mechanisms are contingent on context. In terms of (4), while RCTs are used to examine biomedical as well as social interventions in health, RCTs of social interventions are often distinctive in using qualitative analyses of data on participant accounts to examine questions of meaning and agency not pursued in the natural sciences.ConclusionWe conclude that the most appropriate paradigm for RCTs of social interventions is realism not positivism.

Realists or pragmatists? “Reliable evidence” and the role of the educational psychologist

A psychological perspective of agency and structure within critical realist theory: a specific application to the construct of self-efficacy

The Case for Pragmatic Evidence-Based Higher Education: A Useful Way Forward?

Epistemology and social work: enhancing the integration of theory, practice and research through philosophical pragmatism

Recognising and questioning the epistemological basis of educational psychology practice

Seven key insights from critical realism and their implications for ecological thinking and action in community psychology

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research

A Study on the Role and Attitude of the Education Researchers for Practice

A School Psychology for All: Realizing Evidence-Based Practice Through Social Justice

Between Evidence-Based Education and Professional Judgment, What Future for Teachers and Their Knowledge?

Social Realism and the problem of the problem of knowledge in the sociology of education

Integrating Discourse, Construction and Objectivity: A Contemporary Realist Approach

Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?

Balancing realist review outputs with the needs of policymakers and practitioners

The proxy of Dorian Gray: scientific realism, construct validation and the way forward

Celebrating the Insecure Practitioner. A Critique of Evidence-Based Practice in Adapted Physical Activity

A realist evaluation of prospective entrustment decisions in paediatric residency clinical competency committees

Applied psychology and the case for individual casework: some reflections on the role of the educational psychologist

Are randomised controlled trials positivist? Reviewing the social science and philosophy literature to assess positivist tendencies of trials of social interventions in public health and health services

A Critical Sociocultural Understanding of Evidence-Based Research and Practice Paradigm in Contemporary Psychology

A Realist Evaluation of Social Care Practitioners’ Experiences With and Understanding of Applied Healthcare Research