Abstract:Abstract In Social Work research there is a strong debate on the distinctiveness and methodological quality, and how to address the dilemma of rigour and practice relevance. Given the nature of Social Work the field has developed a characteristic research culture that puts emphasis on giving voice to service users and disseminating research knowledge in practice, especially in a stream of so called practice-based research. However, there is no consensus on how to best contribute to the practice of Social Work through research and at the same time producing rigourous scientific outcomes, resulting in methodological pluralism. Studying the perceptions of Social Work researchers on their role, the aims and values of Social Work research and their research approach, provides insight into the methodological pluralism of Social Work research. Thirty-four professors specialising in practice-based Social Work research participated in a Q methodology study. Q methodology combines qualitative and quantitative methods. It helped reveal and describe divergent views as well as consensus. The analysis led to the identification of three differing viewpoints on Social Work research, which have been given the following denominators: The Substantiator, The Change Agent and The Enlightener. The viewpoints provide researchers in the field of Social Work with a framework in which they can position themselves in the methodological pluralism. Researchers state that the viewpoints are helpful in clarifying perspectives on good research, facilitate the discourse on methodological choices to further develop and strengthen Social Work research as a scientific discipline.

Epistemology and social work: enhancing the integration of theory, practice and research through philosophical pragmatism

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research

Pragmatism and structuralism in occupational therapy: the long conversation

Integrating theory and practice: A new heuristic paradigm for social work practice

Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology

Epistemological Debates in Social work:Positivism vs. Social Constructionism

From Aristotle to Arendt: A phenomenological exploration of forms of knowledge and practice in the context of child protection social work in the UK

From action to transaction: some implications of pragmatism and its concept of agency for development research and practice

Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes

Neoliberalism and social work identity

When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

Philosophical paradigms as the bases for knowledge management research and practice

Practice wisdom: the art and science of social work

Dialectical critical realism, transformative change and social work

Recognising and questioning the epistemological basis of educational psychology practice

Social work theory– practice relationship: Challenges to overcoming positivist and postmodern fragmentation

Social Work in the Digital Era: Theoretical, Ethical and Practical Considerations

Realists or pragmatists? “Reliable evidence” and the role of the educational psychologist

Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective

Re‐conceptualising the link between research and practice in social work: A literature review on knowledge utilisation