Surpassing lithium metal rechargeable batteries with self-supporting Li–Sn–Sb foil anode

Hui Xu,Sa Li,Xinlong Chen,Can Zhang,Zhuoqun Tang,Huimin Fan,Yue Yu,Wenjian Liu,Na Liang,Yunhui Huang,Ju Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104815
IF: 17.6
2020-08-01
Nano Energy
Abstract:<p>Lithium metal rechargeable batteries (LMBs) degrade rapidly due to morphological instabilities as well as electrolyte consumption. As an alternative to Li<sub>BCC</sub> metal foil, in this study, a self-supporting Li–Sb–Sn foil prepared by metallurgically alloying 5 wt%Sb-95 wt%Sn with Li<sub>BCC</sub> is used as the anode in full-cell configurations. The electrochemical performance is highly competitive against equal-thickness pure Li<sub>BCC</sub> foil, exhibiting much slower electrolyte degradation and less volume expansion: at the same amount of industrial-level electrolyte usage, LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/Li–Sn–Sb(50 μm) full cells can sustain twice longer cycle life than LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/Li<sub>BCC</sub>(50 μm) cells. When pairing Li–Sn–Sb anode against high-areal-capacity LiNi<sub>0.5</sub>Co<sub>0.2</sub>Mn<sub>0.3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(NCM523), LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(NCM811) and LiCoO<sub>2</sub>(LCO) cathodes, the cell life is significantly improved compared to lithium metal batteries. In particular, ∼6 mAh cm<sup>−2</sup> LCO/Li–Sb–Sn pouch cell delivers an initial energy density of 1073 Wh L<sup>−1</sup>. Coulombic inefficiency analysis combined with morphological observations reveals that the excellent full-cell performance of Li–Sn–Sb is correlated with the smaller apparent volume expansion (thickening) and superior mesoscale features. Theoretical calculations and experimental measurements affirm doping 5 wt% Sb significantly suppresses porosity and long crack damage, evidenced by the smaller porosity: 11% of Li–Sn–Sb versus 23% of Li–Sn, right after mechanical prelithiation, due to facile stress relief through the sliding grain boundaries (GBs), nano SnSb phase boundaries (PBs) and the soft buffering of residual Sn. The reaction kinetics and lithiation products of Sn electrode also change after doping Sb, breaking down a huge chemomechanical shock (Sn→Li<sub>22</sub>Sn<sub>5</sub>) into several milder ones (Sn→Li<sub>2</sub>Sn<sub>5</sub>→LiSn→Li<sub>22</sub>Sn<sub>5</sub>). While the Li-carrying ability of Li<sub>22</sub>Sn<sub>5</sub> is similar to that of Li<sub>BCC</sub>, the low volume expansion, cycling stability and higher safety of prelithiated Li–Sn–Sb foil means it comprehensively surpasses Li<sub>BCC</sub> metal foil anode.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?