The Golden Angle is not Constructible

Pedro J. Freitas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.10818

2021-01-25

History and Overview

Abstract:We prove that the golden angle (an angle that divides the circle in the golden ratio) is not constructible using straightedge and compass.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Geometric Construction: The Double Straightedge

William Wernick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.64.8.0697

1971-12-01

The Mathematics Teacher

Abstract:THE classical Euclidean constructions allow only the unmarked straightedge and a pair of compasses, now commonly called “a compass.” With these limited tools we can carry through the many beautiful constructions of elementary geometry. A lack of understanding of the “rules of the game” leads to such confused and incorrect statements as “It is impossible to trisect an angle.” But of course we can trisect a right angle; and as for trisecting any angle, there is a simple and elegant construction by Plato that does this very nicely, if we allow such a slight concession as two marks on the straightedge, or even one mark and the endpoint!
Angle Trisection with Growth Rate of The Golden Ratio

Seyed Kazem Mousavi,Hossein Mansouri,Seyed Mehdi Mousavi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32388/qnuqok

2024-03-28

Qeios

Abstract:In this paper, we explore the triangulation of angles using the golden ratio and geometric compass principles. By dividing angles into three equal parts based on the golden ratio, we demonstrate a method for solving this geometric problem. Furthermore, we extend our exploration into the third dimension, where a geometric compass can effectively divide a two-dimensional angle into three equal parts. Additionally, our investigation delves into the realm of six-dimensional space-time, where we observe the simultaneous movement of two arms of the compasses based on the golden ratio to achieve the division of every angle into three equal parts. We emphasize the significance of the growth rate associated with the golden ratio in resolving complex mathematical and physical problems. This study provides valuable insights into the application of geometric principles and the golden ratio in solving challenging problems within mathematics and physics.
Algorithms and Geometric Constructions

Vladimir Uspenskiy,Alexander Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.12579

2018-06-01

Abstract:It is well known that several classical geometry problems (e.g., angle trisection) are unsolvable by compass and straightedge constructions. But what kind of object is proven to be non-existing by usual arguments? These arguments refer to an intuitive idea of a geometric construction as a special kind of an `algorithm' using restricted means (straightedge and/or compass). However, the formalization is not obvious, and different descriptions existing in the literature are far from being complete and clear. We discuss the history of this notion and a possible definition in terms of a simple game

History and Overview
Golden ratio on nonorientable surfaces

Ji-Young Ham,Joongul Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.03482

2019-03-08

Abstract:On each nonorientable surface of odd genus $g \geq 5$, we give a mapping class whose dilatation on an invariant subsurface is the golden ratio.

Geometric Topology
Around Hilbert's theorem: the center of a circle is not constructible by straightedge alone

Martin Klazar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.09747

2021-07-21

Abstract:In order to state the theorem in the title formally and to review its rigorous proof, we extend and make more precise the Uspenskiy-Shen-Akopyan-Fedorov model of Euclidean constructions with arbitrary points; we also introduce formalizations for infinite configurations and for the projective plane. We exemplify the proof method by simpler and not so well known results that it is impossible to construct the unit length, or a given point, by compass and straightedge from nothing by means of classical arbitrary points. On the other hand we construct any given point by compass and straightedge from nothing by means of arbitrary points determined by horizontal segments. We quote a "proof" of Hilbert's theorem from the literature and explain why it is problematic. We rigorously prove Hilbert's theorem and present three variants of it, the last one for the projective plane.

Metric Geometry,History and Overview
An Exact Connection between π and the Golden Ratio φ

Luis Teia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v14n3p20

2022-05-09

Journal of Mathematics Research

Abstract:This article establishes a geometrical and mathematical bridge between the universal constant π  and the golden ratio φ  by interrelating the construction of the area of a circle using two approaches: one formed using the rotation of a regular unit pentagon and the other one from the rotation of its inverse ― the pentagram of side reference φ . The mathematical end result is a linear expression of π  as a function of φ . As an interesting side result, an expression for the area of a circle is derived based on the golden ratio φ  and a geometrically motivated coefficient. A scripted program for the verification of the derived expressions is provided.
CONSTRUCTION OF ANY ANGLE WITHOUT PROTRACTOR

*Muni Nitish Kumar Yaddala,Matte Revanth Hari Narayana,Dr. K. Senthil Kumar,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem12128

2022-04-02

INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT

Abstract:Geometry is one of the foremost significant chapters in mathematics. Construction of angles is one of the important aspects of geometry. The term construction in geometry refers to drawing shapes, lines, or angles accurately with the assistance of mathematical instruments. You will simply need a compass, a ruler (straightedge), and a pencil to construct angles, and a protractor to measure the constructed angle. This is the pure form of geometric construction as no numbers are involved in it. We can only draw some special angles without employing a protractor, such as 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, etc. and non-special angles such as 83, 72, 68, etc. with 1or 2 degrees deviation from the required angles. The method of constructing special angles is generally taught in our lower secondary school. However, using the strategy we devised, we will draw any angle between 0 and 360 degrees without any deviation from the required angle. Constructing angles is important in maths as this method can be extended for the construction of other geometric figures as well, primarily triangles. Keywords: Angle, Degree, Intersection Points, Reference Arc, Primary arc
Geometric constructibility of polygons lying on a circular arc

Delbrin Ahmed,Gábor Czédli,Eszter K. Horváth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.08859

2017-10-24

Abstract:For a positive integer $n$, an $n$-sided polygon lying on a circular arc or, shortly, an $n$-fan is a sequence of $n+1$ points on a circle going counterclockwise such that the "total rotation" $\delta$ from the first point to the last one is at most $2\pi$. We prove that for $n\geq 3$, the $n$-fan cannot be constructed with straightedge and compass in general from its central angle $\delta$ and its central distances, which are the distances of the edges from the center of the circle. Also, we prove that for each fixed $\delta$ in the interval $(0, 2\pi]$ and for every $n\geq 5$, there exists a concrete $n$-fan with central angle $\delta$ that is not constructible from its central distances and $\delta$. The present paper generalizes some earlier results published by the second author and Á. Kunos on the particular cases $\delta=2\pi$ and $\delta=\pi$.

Algebraic Geometry,Metric Geometry
Why the Golden Spiral is Golden

Otis F. Graf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.2023.2273194

2023-11-05

College Mathematics Journal

Abstract:It is shown that there is a logarithmic spiral that segments a straight line through its pole in the golden ratio φ . This is the same spiral that is often referred to in the literature as the "Golden Spiral" Using the tools of analytic geometry and parametric vector equations, it is shown that the golden spiral is actually a member of a family of spirals defined by a generalized equation. The spirals exist as a continuum defined by a real number q > 1. When q=φ , the spiral segments a line through its pole in the golden ratio. That is the characteristic feature that sets it apart from all the other spirals in the continuum.
A constructive version of the Sylvester-Gallai Theorem

Mark Mandelkern

2024-02-06

Abstract:The Sylvester-Gallai Theorem, stated as a problem by J. J. Sylvester in 1893, asserts that for any finite, noncollinear set of points on a plane, there exists a line passing through exactly two points of the set. First, it is shown that for the real plane, the theorem is constructively invalid. Then, a well-known classical proof is examined from a constructive standpoint, locating the nonconstructivities. Finally, a constructive version of the theorem is established for the plane; this reveals the hidden constructive content of the classical theorem. The constructive methods used are those proposed by Errett Bishop.

Metric Geometry
Construction Theorems and Constructive Proofs in Geometry

John B. Burgess

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jpm-2932

2024-09-10

Abstract:Given Tarski’s version of Euclidean straightedge and compass geometry, it is shown how to express construction theorems, and shown that for any purely existential theorem there is a construction theorem implying it. Some related results and open questions are then briefly described.
New regularities of segment division according to the golden ratio

Petro Kosobutskyy,Vira Oksentyuk,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/cds2022.01.057

2022-01-01

Abstract:The paper investigates four problems on the dividing a unit segment by the "golden" proportion. Namely, the general model of the unit segment "golden" division, the decomposition of a square trinomial, the "golden" division of a unit segment by a point with coordinate x 12 are well studied. Therefore, the regularities for the case x 12 and x<12 interconnected by a nonlinear relation of parabolic type ψ=φ2 . In the classical "golden" section theory, it is assumed that after distribution, the parts of the segment do not change their spatial directions, and they coincide with the direction of the original segment, i.e. α=0 . In this article the case α≠0 was studied when, after the distribution, the spatial orientation of the distribution elements changes. The angular dependence of the "golden" division of a unit segment with the loss of "memory" of its parts on the spatial orientation after division, shows a known angle α|p→1→π3 of inclination on the lateral surface of the Hyops.
How to Compute a Triangle with Prescribed Lengths of Its Internal Angle Bisectors

G. Heindl

Abstract:In 1994 P. Mironescu and L. Panaitopol published a non-constructive proof that any three given positive real numbers are the lengths of the internal angle bisectors of a triangle which is unique up to isometries. In the present paper it will be shown that this result can be obtained also by a constructive proof which in addition leads to an efficient method for computing the lengths of the sides of the triangle in question. 1. Preliminaries Let 〈A,B,C〉 be a triangle, a = |−−→ BC|, b = |−→ CA|, c = |−−→ AB| the lengths of its sides, and α = ∠(CAB), β = ∠(ABC), γ = ∠(BCA) its angles. The lengths a, b, c are positive real numbers satisfying the triangle inequalities a < b+ c, b < c+ a, c < a+ b. (1) Conversely, if a, b, c are positive real numbers satisfying the inequalities (1), then there is a triangle 〈A,B,C〉 , unique up to isometries, such that |−−→ BC| = a, |−→ CA| = b, |−−→ AB| = c. The line through A bisecting α is given by { A+ λ( −→ AC b + −→ AB c ) : λ ∈ R } . It cuts the side 〈B,C〉 of the triangle at X = A+ λ′ (−→ AC b + −−→ AB c ) = B + τ ′ −−→ BC, (2) where λ′ = bc b+c and τ ′ = c b+c (see Figure 1). The segment 〈A,X〉 is the so called internal angle bisector (of 〈A,B,C〉) at A. For the length tA = |−−→ AX| of 〈A,X〉 the well-known formula tA = bc ( 1− a 2 (b+ c)2 ) (3) Publication Date: November 22, 2016. Communicating Editor: Paul Yiu.

Mathematics
On a Problem of Fenchel

Feng Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017928526420

1997-01-01

Geometriae Dedicata

Abstract:We give a necessary and sufficient condition for a given set of positive real numbers to be the dihedral angles of a hyperbolic n -simplex in this note. This answers a question of W. Fenchel raised in his book, Elementary Geometry in Hyperbolic Space, (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1989, p. 174) where he obtained some necessary conditions for which six numbers have to satisfy in order to be the dihedral angles of a hyperbolic tetrahedron. We also present a simple proof of the known necessary and sufficient condition for the dihedral angles of Euclidean n -simplexes.
On the Mechanization of Straightedge and Compass Constructions

Pascal Schreck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-8347-1

2019-02-01

Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

Abstract:<h3 class="a-plus-plus">Abstract</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">The geometric constructions obtained with only straightedge and compass are famous and play a special role in the development of geometry. On the one hand, the constructibility of figures is a key ingredient in Euclid geometry and, on the other hand, unconstructibility gave birth to famous open problems of the ancient Greece which were unlocked only in the nineteenth century using discoveries in algebra. This paper discusses the mechanization of straightedge and compass constructions. It focuses on the algebraic approaches and presents two methods which are implemented; one is due to Lebesgue and the other one was jointly designed by Gao and Chou. Some links between the algebraic approach of constructions and synthetic geometry are described.</p>

mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
There is no Heron triangle with three rational medians

Logman Shihaliev

2024-04-13

Abstract:The subject of this article is the proof that the Heron triangle with three integer medians does not exist. The article provides proofs of three lemmas. As a result, the infinite descent method proved that the Heron triangle with three integer medians does not exist. In the process of proving Lemma 3, the fact was used that there is no right-angled Heron triangle with three integer medians. And then it is proved that there is no Heron triangle with three natural medians. The relevance of this article lies in the fact that the problem under study is one of the unsolved problems of number theory.

Combinatorics,Metric Geometry
Comparing angles in Euclid's Elements

Alexander Shen

2024-04-03

Abstract:The exposition in Euclid's Elements contains an obvious gap (seemingly unnoticed by most commentators): he often compares not just angles, but *groups* of angles, and at the same time he avoids summing angles (and considering angles greater than $\pi$), and does not say what such a comparison of groups could mean. We discuss the problem and suggest a possible interpretation that could make Euclid's exposition consistent.

History and Overview
A New Theorem Relating the Tangent Secant Theorem to the Golden Ratio

M. N. Tarabishy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.08212

2021-12-22

General Mathematics

Abstract:The golden ratio is usually shrouded in mystique and mystery, however, showing its emergence from a familiar geometric setting makes it a more natural phenomenon. In this work, we present a new theorem connecting the Tangent Secant theorem to the golden ratio. Such a connection enhances the learning process of the theorem, and it demystifies the golden ratio in physics and other disciplines.
Cabinet of curiosities: the interesting geometry of the angle β = arccos((3ϕ - 1)/4)

Fang Fang,Klee Irwin,Julio Kovacs,Garrett Sadler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.1771

2013-04-04

Abstract:In this paper we present the construction of several aggregates of tetrahedra. Each construction is obtained by performing rotations on an initial set of tetrahedra that either (1) contains gaps between adjacent tetrahedra, or (2) exhibits an aperiodic nature. Following this rotation, gaps of the former case are "closed" (in the sense that faces of adjacent tetrahedra are brought into contact to form a "face junction") while translational and rotational symmetries are obtained in the latter case. In all cases, an angular displacement of {\beta} = arccos((3{\phi} - 1)/4) (or a closely related angle), where {\phi} is the golden ratio, is observed between faces of a junction. Additionally, the overall number of plane classes, defined as the number of distinct facial orientations in the collection of tetrahedra, is reduced following the transformation. Finally, we present several "curiosities" involving the structures discussed here with the goal of inspiring the reader's interest in constructions of this nature and their attending, interesting properties.

Metric Geometry
Gold ratio and a trigonometric identity

Vladimir Shevelev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0909.5072

2009-09-29

Abstract:We give two proofs of the identity $$\sqrt{\frac{\cos\frac{2\pi}{5}} {\cos\frac{\pi}{5}}}+\sqrt{\frac{\cos\frac{\pi}{5}} {\cos\frac{2\pi}{5}} }=\sqrt{5},$$ using and not using the gold ratio.

History and Overview

The Golden Angle is not Constructible

Geometric Construction: The Double Straightedge

Angle Trisection with Growth Rate of The Golden Ratio

Algorithms and Geometric Constructions

Golden ratio on nonorientable surfaces

Around Hilbert's theorem: the center of a circle is not constructible by straightedge alone

An Exact Connection between π and the Golden Ratio φ

CONSTRUCTION OF ANY ANGLE WITHOUT PROTRACTOR

Geometric constructibility of polygons lying on a circular arc

Why the Golden Spiral is Golden

A constructive version of the Sylvester-Gallai Theorem

Construction Theorems and Constructive Proofs in Geometry

New regularities of segment division according to the golden ratio

How to Compute a Triangle with Prescribed Lengths of Its Internal Angle Bisectors

On a Problem of Fenchel

On the Mechanization of Straightedge and Compass Constructions

There is no Heron triangle with three rational medians

Comparing angles in Euclid's Elements

A New Theorem Relating the Tangent Secant Theorem to the Golden Ratio

Cabinet of curiosities: the interesting geometry of the angle β = arccos((3ϕ - 1)/4)

Gold ratio and a trigonometric identity