Catalytically Active Site Identification of Molybdenum Disulfide as Gas Cathode in a Nonaqueous Li–CO 2 Battery

Chih-Jung Chen,Chih-Sheng Huang,Yu-Cheng Huang,Fu-Ming Wang,Xing-Chun Wang,Ching-Chen Wu,Wen-Sheng Chang,Chung-Li Dong,Li-Chang Yin,Ru-Shi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17942
2021-01-28
Abstract:Li–CO<sub>2</sub> batteries have recently attracted attention as promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices due to their extremely high theoretical energy density. The real application of Li–CO<sub>2</sub> cells involves addressing several drawbacks, including high charging potential, poor coulombic efficiency, and low rechargeability. Molybdenum disulfide supported on carbon nanotubes (MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT) with various ratios functioned as a cathode catalyst for Li–CO<sub>2</sub> batteries. The optimal MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT composite achieved a maximum discharge capacity of 8551 mAh g<sup>–1</sup> with a coulombic efficiency of 96.7%. This hybrid also obtained an initial charging plateau of 3.87 V at a current density of 100 mA g<sup>–1</sup> with a cutoff capacity of 500 mAh g<sup>–1</sup>. It provided ideal electrochemical stability of 142 cycles at the current densities of 100 mA g<sup>–1</sup>, which was comparable with that of some precious metal catalysts. This optimized MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT was also cycled at 200 and 400 mA g<sup>–1</sup> for 112 and 55 times, respectively. Density functional theory calculations demonstrated that the sulfided Mo-edge (s-Mo-edge) on MoS<sub>2</sub> materials showed appropriate adsorption strengths of Li, CO<sub>2</sub>, and Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. Moreover, joint results of Raman profiles and extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectra elucidated that the catalytic efficiencies of MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT hybrids were proportional to the quantities of exposed s-Mo-edge active sites.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c17942?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c17942</a>.Computational method; XPS spectra of bare MoS<sub>2</sub> and MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT catalysts (Figure S1); full discharge–charge profiles of bare CNT and bare MoS<sub>2</sub> cathodes (Figure S2); SEM with elemental mapping spectra of bare MoS<sub>2</sub> and MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT catalysts (Figure S3); electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of bare MoS<sub>2</sub> and MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT cathodes (Figure S4); cycling performances of bare CNT, MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT, and MoS<sub>2</sub>-CNT cathodes (Figure S5–S7, S9); photograph and XRD diagrams of electrodes after the cycling measurement (Figure S8); high-resolution Mo 3d XPS spectrum of MoS<sub>2</sub>/CNT cathode (Figure S10); calculated adsorption energies of Li, CO<sub>2</sub>, and Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> on different sites of MoS<sub>2</sub> (Figure S11–S13); charge density difference of CO<sub>2</sub> on different sites of MoS<sub>2</sub> (Figure S14); comparisons of electrochemical performances with previous studies (Table S1); and fitting parameters for Mo EXAFS spectra (Table S2) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c17942/suppl_file/am0c17942_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?