Abstract:Companies facing serious financial distress are more likely to engage in income-increasing earnings management than healthy firms in order to mask poor performance. In these contexts, audit firms might increase substantive tests, that should constrain discretionary accruals, as well as charging risk premiums, both resulting in growing audit fees. The different components of audit fees, namely a fee premium for auditors’ efforts or risk premium, however, have an opposing impact on audit quality. This paper aims thus to investigate how the business context status of a client might differently affect the auditors’ pricing policies and commitments in the audit process. We address our research questions adopting a matched sample consisting of bankrupt and healthy US firms in the post-SOX period, between 2005 and 2015. Consistent with our predictions, the results show a significant propensity of ex-post bankrupt firms to adopt upward earnings management. In these critical contexts, it reveals that auditors are primarily concerned about obtaining a risk premium, especially in the first year of an engagement, rather than extending the audit efforts to constrain earnings manipulation. By contrast, the higher audit fees charged to healthy companies by the newly appointed auditors result in effective audit efforts, therefore improving the earnings quality. This study thus provides evidence that in riskier business contexts auditors prefer conservative approaches to pro-active commitments by primarily adjusting risk premiums in response to a higher litigation risk. The paper contributes to the extant literature by documenting the existence of a component in the audit fees that results in low audit quality.

Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort

Responsiveness of Auditors to the Audit Risk Standards: Unique Evidence from Big 4 Audit Firms

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

Climate Risk and Audit Fees: an International Study

Earnings management risk and audit pricing: Evidence from big bath accounting

Does Controlling Shareholders’ Financial Risk Affect Auditors’ Perceptions of Firms’ Financial Reporting Risk? Evidence from Share Pledging

The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the Audit Process: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Delay

Accounting Conservatism and Auditing Fee:Analysis Basing on the Audit Risk Control Strategy

Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China

On accounting’s twenty-first century challenge: evidence on the relation between intangible assets and audit fees

Does Real Activitties of Manipulation Affect Auditors's Risk Treatment Decisions?

Adults in the room? The auditor and dividends in small firms: evidence from a natural experiment

AUDIT FEES LOW-BALLING , AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES : EVIDENCE FROM FIJI

Audit fees, motivation of avoiding loss and opinion shopping

Auditor industry specialization and real earnings management

Auditor Legal Liability and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Organizational Transformation of Chinese Audit Firms

Audit Fees and the Large Auditor Premium in the Italian Market

Financial Constraints, Auditing, and External Financing

Ultimate Rights and Audit Fee Payments: Evidence from China

Non�?Audit Fees and Auditor Independence: New Evidence Based on Going Concern Opinions for U.S. Companies Under Stress

Rank-and-file employee stock options and audit pricing: Evidence from S&P 1500 firms