Abstract:Companies facing serious financial distress are more likely to engage in income-increasing earnings management than healthy firms in order to mask poor performance. In these contexts, audit firms might increase substantive tests, that should constrain discretionary accruals, as well as charging risk premiums, both resulting in growing audit fees. The different components of audit fees, namely a fee premium for auditors’ efforts or risk premium, however, have an opposing impact on audit quality. This paper aims thus to investigate how the business context status of a client might differently affect the auditors’ pricing policies and commitments in the audit process. We address our research questions adopting a matched sample consisting of bankrupt and healthy US firms in the post-SOX period, between 2005 and 2015. Consistent with our predictions, the results show a significant propensity of ex-post bankrupt firms to adopt upward earnings management. In these critical contexts, it reveals that auditors are primarily concerned about obtaining a risk premium, especially in the first year of an engagement, rather than extending the audit efforts to constrain earnings manipulation. By contrast, the higher audit fees charged to healthy companies by the newly appointed auditors result in effective audit efforts, therefore improving the earnings quality. This study thus provides evidence that in riskier business contexts auditors prefer conservative approaches to pro-active commitments by primarily adjusting risk premiums in response to a higher litigation risk. The paper contributes to the extant literature by documenting the existence of a component in the audit fees that results in low audit quality.

Audit Fees and the Large Auditor Premium in the Italian Market

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

Determinants of audit fees in quoted financial and non-financial firms

Corruption and audit fees: New evidence from EU27 countries

The Impact of Company Size Indicators on the Audit Fee

Joint Audit Engagements and Client Tax Avoidance: Evidence from the Italian Statutory Audit Regime

Do firms pay for audit risk? Evidence on risk premiums in audit fees after direct control for audit effort

Determinants of Audit Fees : Evidence from UK Alternative Investment Market

Algorithmic Audit of Italian Car Insurance: Evidence of Unfairness in Access and Pricing

CPA Firm Size and Audit Fee: Evidence from Chinese Local CPA Firms

Determinants of Audit Fees in Nigerian Consumer Goods Sector

Determinants of abnormal audit fees in international financial reporting standards-based financial statements

Long-term Characteristic Research on Determinants of Audit Fees

Business Group Affiliation, Board Quality and Audit Pricing Behavior: Evidence from Indian Companies

WHAT AUDIT FEATURES IMPACT VALUE RELEVANCE OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION?

Correlation Test of Auditor Industry Specialization and Audit Pricing——Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies' Audit Market

AUDIT FEES LOW-BALLING , AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES : EVIDENCE FROM FIJI

Executive compensation and firm performance in Italy

Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of Audit Fee of Listed Company in China: Evidence from A Stock Market in China

Auditor size and audit quality

The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the Audit Process: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Delay