Abstract:Purpose This paper investigates whether the audit fees of Chinese listed firms are associated with the share pledging practice of the firm’s controlling shareholders. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the audit pricing model to estimate the association between the share pledging of listed firms and audit fees. Cross-sectional analysis is conducted on a large sample of Chinese listed firms during the period 2004 to 2019. The authors further test the moderating effects of listing on the Main Board, state ownership and abnormal audit report lag on the association between share pledging and audit fees. The results remain robust to various endogeneity tests including two-stage least squares instrumental variable analysis, entropy balancing analysis and difference-in-difference analysis. Findings The study finds that audit fees are positively associated with the proportion of shares pledged by the listed firm’s controlling shareholder in China. The results also provide new evidence that the positive association between audit fees and the share pledging of controlling shareholders could be mitigated if the firm is listed on the Main Board and/or it is a state-owned enterprise. In contrast, pledged firms with abnormal audit report lag are found to have higher audit fees than their pledged counterparts without the excessively long audit delay. Practical implications Findings of this study have important practical implications to those charged with governance, as boards need to comprehensively understand the adverse consequences of share pledging when pursuing it as the firm’s major source of financing. The study also has policy implications for stock market regulators such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission in China. Regulators could consider developing a threshold-based share pledging disclosure and pledge ratio requirements based on factors such as a firm’s listing status and ownership structure. Originality/value This study provides new evidence on the audit-related consequences of share pledging in a significant capital market. Findings of this study also enrich the existing audit literature by introducing the share pledging activities of controlling shareholders into the audit pricing decision-making model.

Rank-and-file employee stock options and audit pricing: Evidence from S&P 1500 firms

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Employee Quality and Audit Fee: Evidence from China

Study on Earnings Management of Share Options in Listed Companies and Its Influential Factors

Employee education, labor protection intensity and auditor risk perception

Employee Stock Options, Equity Valuation, and the Valuation of Option Grants Using a Warrant-Pricing Model

Option implied riskiness and risk-taking incentives of executive compensation

The Impact of Managerial Stock Option on Firm Risk Taking: Evidence from China

Do auditors care about what retail investors say? Evidence from China

The 1990s witnessed an explosion in the use of restricted stock and stock options

Managerial myopia and audit fees: Evidence from China

Audit Fees and Auditor Choice in Different Levels of Marketization——Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Executive compensation and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from private loan contracts

Estimating the Cost of Executive Stock Options: evidence from Switzerland

Buy, Lie, or Die: an Investigation of Chinese ST Firms’ Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence

An empirical study of executive option grants around initial public offerings

Rent-seeking Motivation and Auditing Market:Evidence from IPO Private Firms

Do auditors respond when listed firms pledge shares? Evidence from China

Stock and Option Proportions in Executive Compensation

Do Auditors Learn from Stock Prices of Their Clients? Evidence from Audit Adjustments of Pre-audited Earnings