Abstract:Abstract Background Circadian clocks allow organisms to anticipate daily fluctuations in their environment by driving rhythms in physiology and behavior. Inter-organismal differences in daily rhythms, called chronotypes, exist and can shift with age. In ants, age, caste-related behavior and chronotype appear to be linked. Brood-tending nurse ants are usually younger individuals and show “around-the-clock” activity. With age or in the absence of brood, nurses transition into foraging ants that show daily rhythms in activity. Ants can adaptively shift between these behavioral castes and caste-associated chronotypes depending on social context. We investigated how changes in daily gene expression could be contributing to such behavioral plasticity in Camponotus floridanus carpenter ants by combining time-course behavioral assays and RNA-Sequencing of forager and nurse brains. Results We found that nurse brains have three times fewer 24 h oscillating genes than foragers. However, several hundred genes that oscillated every 24 h in forager brains showed robust 8 h oscillations in nurses, including the core clock genes Period and Shaggy . These differentially rhythmic genes consisted of several components of the circadian entrainment and output pathway, including genes said to be involved in regulating insect locomotory behavior. We also found that Vitellogenin , known to regulate division of labor in social insects, showed robust 24 h oscillations in nurse brains but not in foragers. Finally, we found significant overlap between genes differentially expressed between the two ant castes and genes that show ultradian rhythms in daily expression. Conclusion This study provides a first look at the chronobiological differences in gene expression between forager and nurse ant brains. This endeavor allowed us to identify a putative molecular mechanism underlying plastic timekeeping: several components of the ant circadian clock and its output can seemingly oscillate at different harmonics of the circadian rhythm. We propose that such chronobiological plasticity has evolved to allow for distinct regulatory networks that underlie behavioral castes, while supporting swift caste transitions in response to colony demands. Behavioral division of labor is common among social insects. The links between chronobiological and behavioral plasticity that we found in C. floridanus , thus, likely represent a more general phenomenon that warrants further investigation.

Daniel Kronauer

The Budding Neuroscience of Ant Social Behavior

Prehistory, neuroscience, and evolutionary anthropology: a personal journey

Understanding the Relationship Between Brain Gene Expression and Social Behavior: Lessons from the Honey Bee

Nature, Nurture, and Their Interplay

A molecular toolkit for superorganisms

Nicholas Bellono

Time-course RNASeq of Camponotus floridanus forager and nurse ant brains indicate links between plasticity in the biological clock and behavioral division of labor

Scientific Curiosity and the Natural World

Integrating computer vision and molecular neurobiology to bridge the gap between behavior and the brain

How can ethology inform the neuroscience of fear, aggression and dominance?

Insights from the past: the work of Hans von Alten on the evolution of brain structure, ecological adaptation, and cognition in hymenopteran species

Patterns of Positive Selection in Seven Ant Genomes

Applying Quantitative Genetic Methods to Primate Social Behavior

Genetics in the Honey Bee: Achievements and Prospects toward the Functional Analysis of Molecular and Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Behaviors

Natural primate neurobiology

Automated behavioural fingerprinting of C. elegans mutants

Gene-culture interaction on human behavior and the brain

Cori Bargmann

Natural selection drives the evolution of ant life cycles

The Empathic Brain of Psychopaths: From Social Science to Neuroscience in Empathy