Abstract:This study investigates the determinants of choosing in-kind benefits over cash transfers when their respective values are equivalent. Employing a rigorous two-step experiment with a large sample size (n = 962), we offer real monetary rewards to respondents. In the first step, we asked whether the respondents would choose NRs. 1,000 (≈ US dollars 9) in cash or in-kind benefit that is worth NRs. 1,000. We observe that approximately two-thirds of participants opt for in-kind benefits of equal value to the proposed cash transfer. In analyzing the factors influencing this preference, our results indicate that households with higher non-farm incomes are less likely to choose in-kind benefits. Increasing the non-farm income by NRs. 100,000 respondents are 0.2% less likely to choose in-kind benefits. Furthermore, households with limited savings demonstrate a higher preference toward in-kind benefits over cash transfers. Not having NRs. 25,000 savings would make respondents 10% more likely to choose in-kind benefits. Previously receiving in-kind benefits also increase the likelihood of choosing them over cash. Additionally, households with restricted market access are more inclined to opt for in-kind benefits. Notably, in the second step of the experiment which involves only those who chose cash in the first step of the experiment, only 48% of respondents would opt for in-kind benefits even when values were higher by NRs. 150 to 450. This research sheds light on the factors affecting the decision-making process between in-kind benefits and cash transfers and provides insights into the design of effective social welfare policies. More specifically, findings from this study suggest tailored approaches for assisting people could be followed based on their income level and accessibility to the market.

Are non-fungible payments attractive when they reduce risk exposure? Evidence from Colombia

Testing the effectiveness of lottery incentives in online experiments

Identifying Heterogeneity Using Recursive Partitioning: Evidence from SMS Nudges Encouraging Voluntary Retirement Savings in Mexico

Determinants of choosing in-kind benefits over cash: A study among Nepalese farmers

Can Climate Shocks Make Vulnerable Subjects More Willing to Take Risks?

Contrasting risk preferences in the shadow of volcanic background risk: a field experiment in Arequipa, Perú

Probabilistic Outcomes Are Valued Less in Expectation, Even Conditional on Their Realization

Cashing In (and Out): Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Mobile Money in Malawi

Fair payments for effective environmental conservation

Experimental evidence on the effect of incentives and domain in risk aversion and discounting tasks

Risk preferences, technology adoption and insurance uptake: A framed experiment

Does inequality impede risk management? Evidence from a lab experiment in Ghana

Consumption Vouchers during COVID-19: Evidence from E-Commerce

Utility, Risk and Demand for Incomplete Insurance: Lab Experiments with Guatemalan Co-Operatives

Why High Incentives Cause Repugnance: A Framed Field Experiment

Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety

Short- and Long-Term Effects of Incentives on Prosocial Behavior: The Case of Ride Vouchers to a Blood Collection Agency

Transitory income changes and consumption smoothing: Evidence from Mexico

Incentivizing Exploration with Heterogeneous Value of Money

The impact of a reproductive health voucher in Uganda using a quasi-experimental matching design

Testing the permanent income hypothesis using the Spanish Christmas Lottery