Abstract:Expanding a limited empirical base on effects of risk comparisons, a pilot experiment explored how varying elements of such comparisons might influence public response. The scenario used was a hypothetical trial of an asbestos-installing firm for putting students and staff at a junior high school at "unreasonable risk," first used by Slovic et al. (1990). Study participants played the role of jurors in the trial, asked to rate the risk, the firm's guilt, whether it should be made liable for future health effects, whether the school should be occupied in its current condition, and whether the asbestos should be removed at a cost of 3 million dollars. Opportunity samples of New Jersey residents (n= 309) received information intended to vary four comparison attributes: number of dimensions of comparison; single versus multiple ways of expressing mortality; a narrative to explain and justify the risk comparison; and the hypothetical role of the participant (juror vs. parent). The dependent variable was a hazard scale constructed from four of the five postcomparison judgments. ANOVA found format variations swamped in their effect by concern about asbestos, with the absence of a narrative and the parental role being the only attributes that increased negative risk reactions. Multiple regression analyses found that multidimensionality, narrative, role, and the presence of any risk comparison at all had significant effects when these (plus death formats) were the only independent variables. However, only multidimensionality (which increased negative reactions) retained significance when asbestos concern, risk beliefs (no safe level of exposure to a carcinogen; any exposure leads to cancer), and demographic variables were added to the analysis. Concern and risk beliefs alone explained 33% of variance in hazard scores; adding demographics and risk comparison variables only raised explained variance to 36% (having children at home and being exposed to multidimensional risk comparisons raised scores; age and income lowered them). The results underline the potentially small effect of risk comparison information on risk views (at least between subjects), but offer some insight into aspects of message design left unexplored in empirical literature to date.

Contrasting risk preferences in the shadow of volcanic background risk: a field experiment in Arequipa, Perú

Can Climate Shocks Make Vulnerable Subjects More Willing to Take Risks?

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Revealing risk preferences Evidence from Turkeys 2023 Earthquake

Living in-between: Implications of local risk perceptions for the management of future eruptions at the Calbuco and Osorno volcanoes (Ensenada, Chile)

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

Impact of Violent Crime on Risk Aversion: Evidence from the Mexican Drug War

Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk

Living with Risks: Changes in Risk Perception in the Campi Flegrei Volcanic Area (South Italy)

Eliciting Public Risk Preferences in Emergency Situations

Do people feel less at risk? Evidence from disaster experience

Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges

Varying risk comparison elements: effects on public reactions

Why do people persist in sea-level rise threatened coastal regions? Empirical evidence on risk aversion and place attachment

Impact of risk preferences on evacuee behavior and attention distribution in urban underground space evacuations

Risk messaging style and its effect on public preparedness for earthquakes: longitudinal intervention-based study

Experiments on Risk Attitude: the Case of Chinese Students

Respiratory and physical health consequences in older adults in a high-risk volcanic area: Comparison of two rural villages

Question-Order Effects on Judgements under Uncertainty

Experimental evidence on the effect of incentives and domain in risk aversion and discounting tasks

Trust, risk, and gender: Evidence from the Black Saturday Fires in Victoria, Australia