Abstract:Within just 7 years, behavioral decision research in psychology underwent a dramatic change: In 1967, Peterson and Beach (1967) reviewed more than 160 experiments concerned with people's statistical intuitions. Invoking the metaphor of the mind as an intuitive statistician, they concluded that "probability theory and statistics can be used as the basis for psychological models that integrate and account for human performance in a wide range of inferential tasks" (p. 29). Yet in a 1974 Science article, Tversky and Kahneman rejected this conclusion, arguing that "people rely on a limited number of heuristic principles which reduce the complex tasks of assessing probabilities and predicting values to simple judgmental operations" (p. 1124). With that, they introduced the heuristics-and-biases research program, which has profoundly altered how psychology, and the behavioral sciences more generally, view the mind's competences and rationality. How was this radical transformation possible? We examine a previously neglected driver: The heuristics-and-biases program established an experimental protocol in behavioral decision research that relied on described scenarios rather than learning and experience. We demonstrate this shift with an analysis of 604 experiments, which shows that the descriptive protocol has dominated post-1974 research. Specifically, we examine two lines of research addressed in the intuitive-statistician program (Bayesian reasoning and judgments of compound events) and two lines of research spurred by the heuristics-and-biases program (framing and anchoring and adjustment). We conclude that the focus on description at the expense of learning has profoundly shaped the influential view of the error-proneness of human cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges

Risk evaluation and behaviour: defining appropriate frames of reference

Behavioral insurance and economic theory: A literature review

From small to big data: (mis)uses of insurance premium for the government of hazards

Risk preferences, gender effects and Bayesian econometrics

ECONOMIC EXPERIMENTS, HYPOTHETICAL SURVEYS AND MARKET DATA STUDIES OF INSURANCE DEMAND AGAINST LOW‐PROBABILITY/HIGH‐IMPACT RISKS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DESIGNS, THEORETICAL INSIGHTS AND DETERMINANTS OF DEMAND

Estimating risk preferences integrating insurance choices with subjective beliefs

Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference

Risk preferences, technology adoption and insurance uptake: A framed experiment

Rationalizing risk aversion in science

Risk Preference Study and Its Possible Future Development

Insurance customer behavior: Lessons from behavioral economics

Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia

Inferring Risk Perceptions and Preferences Using Choice from Insurance Menus: Theory and Evidence

Can Climate Shocks Make Vulnerable Subjects More Willing to Take Risks?

Risk inequality aversion and biases born of social position: Further experimental tests of the leaky bucket

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality.

Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation

Eliciting Public Risk Preferences in Emergency Situations

Rationalizing risk aversion in science: Why incentives to work hard clash with incentives to take risks