Abstract:We study the consumption response to typical labor income shocks and investigate how these vary by wealth and race. First, we estimate the elasticity of consumption with respect to income using an instrument based on firm-wide changes in monthly pay. While much of the consumption-smoothing literature uses variation in unusual windfall income, this instrument captures the income variation that households typically experience. In addition, because it can be constructed for every worker in every month, it allows for more precision than most previous estimates. We implement this approach in administrative bank account data and find an average elasticity of 0.23, with a standard error of 0.01. The increased precision also allows us to address an open question about the extent of heterogeneity by wealth in the elasticity. We find a much lower consumption response for high liquidity households, which may help discipline structural consumption models.Second, we use this instrument to study how wealth shapes racial inequality. An extensive body of work documents a substantial racial and ethnic wealth gap. However, less is known about how this gap translates into differences in welfare on a month-to-month basis. We make progress on this question by combining our instrument for typical income volatility with a new dataset linking bank account data with race and Hispanicity. We find that black (Hispanic) households cut their consumption 50 (20) percent more than white households when faced with a similarly-sized income shock. Nearly all of this differential pass-through of income to consumption is explained in a statistical sense by differences in liquid wealth. Combining our empirical estimates with a model, we show that temporary income volatility has a substantial welfare cost for all groups. Because of racial disparities in consumption smoothing, the cost is at least 50 percent higher for black households and 20 percent higher for Hispanic households than it is for white households.

Transitory income changes and consumption smoothing: Evidence from Mexico

The long-term impact of (un)conditional cash transfers on labour market outcomes in Ecuador

Testing the permanent income hypothesis using the Spanish Christmas Lottery

Cash transfers before pregnancy and infant health

The direct and indirect effects of cash transfer program on the consumption of nutrients: Evidence from Kenya

Wealth, Race, and Consumption Smoothing of Typical Income Shocks

Short-term labor supply response to the timing of transfer payments: Evidence from the SNAP program

Reduction in purchases of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods in Mexico associated with the introduction of a tax in 2014

The impact of measured income uncertainty on Spanish household consumption at the end of the Great Recession

How are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel

A Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis When Households are Less Constrained

The poverty alleviation effect of transfer payments: evidence from China

Relative power: Explaining the effects of food and cash transfers on allocative behaviour in rural Nepalese households

Role of Government Policies in Smoothing Borrowers' Spending during Stress: Evidence from UK Mortgage Moratoria

Cash transfer and female labor supply: evidence from Brazil’s rural area

Anticipated Benefit Termination and Health Care Consumption Responses: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment

The Impacts of a Multifaceted Prenatal Intervention on Human Capital Accumulation in Early Life

Consumption Fluctuations and Welfare: Evidence from China

Heterogeneity of consumption responses to income shocks in the presence of nonlinear persistence

Cash Transfers and the Phillips Curve: The Case of Brazil during the Pandemic

The Psychology of Poverty: Evidence from the Field