A Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis When Households are Less Constrained

EMMA AISBETT,MARKUS BRUECKNER,RALF STEINHAUSER,RHETT WILCOX
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13124
IF: 1.963
2024-01-08
Journal of money credit and banking
Abstract:In 2009, the Australian Government delivered approximately $8 billion in direct payments to households. These payments were randomly allocated over a 5‐week period. Panel model estimates show that for the average household, there was no significant disbursement effect on nondurable consumption. Only for relatively young and low‐income households, for example, at the bottom 10th percentile of each, was there a significant positive effect of the tax bonus payment on nondurable consumption. We argue the null findings on average could be due to macroeconomic and institutional differences leaving Australian households less constrained than their U.S. counterparts.
economics,business, finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?