Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement
Christopher R. Carpenter,Nada Hammouda,Elizabeth A. Linton,Michelle Doering,Ugochi K. Ohuabunwa,Kelly J. Ko,William W. Hung,Manish N. Shah,Lee A. Lindquist,Kevin Biese,Daniel Wei,Libby Hoy,Lori Nerbonne,Ula Hwang,Scott M. Dresden,M Fernanda Bellolio,Kevin Biese,Christine Binkley,Nicholas Bott,Abraham Brody,Christopher Carpenter,Sunday Clark,M Scott Dresden,Savannah Forrester,Lowell Gerson,Cameron Gettel,Elizabeth Goldberg,Allyson Greenberg,Nada Hammouda,Jin Han,S. Nicole Hastings,Tess Hogan,William Hung,Ula Hwang,Jay Kayser,Maura Kennedy,Kelly Ko,Adriane Lesser,Elizabeth Linton,Shan Liu,Aaron Malsch,Daniel Matlock,Frances McFarland,Don Melady,Carmen Morano,Nancy Morrow‐Howell,Denise Nassisi,Lori Nerbonne,Sylvie Nyamu,Ugochi Ohuabunwa,Timothy Platts‐Mills,Luna Ragsdale,Lynne Richardson,Thom Ringer,Anthony Rosen,Mark Rosenberg,Manish Shah,Rachel Skains,Stephanie Skees,Kimberly Souffront,Laura Stabler,Connor Sullivan,Joe Suyama,Samuel Vargas,E. Camille Vaughan,Corrine Voils,Daniel Wei,Nancy Wexler,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14166
2020-12-12
Academic Emergency Medicine
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Older adult delirium is often unrecognized in the emergency department (ED), yet the most compelling research questions to overcome knowledge‐to‐practice deficits remain undefined. The Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR) Network was organized to identify and prioritize delirium clinical questions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>GEAR identified and engaged 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders including emergency physicians, geriatricians, nurses, social workers, pharmacists, and patient advocates. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses for Scoping Reviews, clinical questions were derived, medical librarian electronic searches conducted, and applicable research evidence synthesized for ED delirium detection, prevention, and management. The scoping review served as the foundation for a consensus conference to identify the highest priority research foci.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In the scoping review, 27 delirium detection "instruments" were described in 48 ED studies and used variable criterion standards with the result of delirium prevalence ranging from 6% to 38%. Clinician gestalt was the most common "instrument" evaluated with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 81% and specificity from 65% to 100%. For delirium management 15 relevant studies were identified, including one randomized controlled trial. Some intervention studies targeted clinicians via education and others used clinical pathways. Three medications were evaluated to reduce or prevent ED delirium. No intervention consistently prevented or treated delirium. After reviewing the scoping review results, the GEAR stakeholders identified ED delirium prevention interventions not reliant upon additional nurse or physician effort as the highest priority research.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Transdisciplinary stakeholders prioritize ED delirium prevention studies that are not reliant upon healthcare worker tasks instead of alternative research directions such as defining etiologic delirium phenotypes to target prevention or intervention strategies.</p></section>
emergency medicine