Infusion cholecystography

K. Poskitt,I. Lane,A. Taylor,T. Cooke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800720236

1985-02-01

Abstract:require postoperative oesophageal dilatation. Ninety-two of our patients (of the total of 109) had a stricture secondary to GOR without either intubation or previous surgery. Of these patients, 18 had undergone anti-reflux surgery at the time of submission of the paper and a further nine patients have been operated on subsequently. Thus, 27 of these 92 patients (29 per cent) have had anti-reflux surgery which is similar to the figure of 35 per cent reported by Mr Watson (42 out of 120 patients). We believe that all patients under the age of 60, and even the fitter patients over this age, should be considered for anti-reflux surgery. An adenocarcinoma which is detected in an apparently benign oesophageal stricture some time after the initial diagnosis may either have been missed at the original endoscopy, simply occurred by chance or, most commonly, developed in patients with a columnar lined lower oesophagus (CLO). The risk of missing an adenocarcinoma initially can be minimized by taking multiple biopsies, particularly in the patient who has a benign stricture but no macroscopic oesophagitis. In this latter situation we would recommend that the endoscopy and biopsy be repeated on at least one further occasion to be certain there is no carcinoma present. As our group have the largest seriesof patients witha CLO in the United Kingdom that have been reported’ we are fully aware of the risks of development of an adenocarcinoma in these patients. It was not our intention in this paper to discuss in detail the management of different types of oesophageal strictures. Approximately %percent of patients with a CLO have an associated oesophageal stricture and there is no doubt that these patients should be treated differently from patients with a squamous lined oesophagus. Although the development of a CLO appears to be related to the extent of the gastro-oesophageal reflux’ there is no evidence that the mucosa will revert back to normal with intensive medical treatment’. Patients with a CLO should be endoscoped at 6-12 monthly intervals, the time interval depending on the presence or absence of oesophageal ulcers, dysplasia in the biopsy or perhaps intestinal metaplasia of incomplete type’. Whilst accepting that the risk of guide wire perforation is small this technique does require the facilities of an endoscopy unit with radiological screening facilities. Even if we were to exclude the 29 per cent of patients who have undergone anti-reflux surgery and also those patients with a columnar lined oesophagus who require regular endoscopy we are still left with a large number of patients for whom outpatient dilatation of their benign stricture using a Maloney’s dilator is an acceptable, safe and effective form of dilatation. C. J. Stoddard* J. M. Simmst