Abstract:The latest regulatory framework, which has been introduced globally in the form of Basel III, and its implementation in the legislation of the member states of the European Union has generated much interest in the impact of regulation on the efficiency and profitability of banks. This study aims to examine the impact of the introduction of two major regulatory changes (Basel II and Basel III) on bank performance, in terms of bank size and bank-specific and macroeconomic variables. A two-stage empirical analysis was conducted on a sample of 433 European commercial banks over the 2006–2015 period. In the first stage, relative efficiency was calculated using non-parametric data envelopment analysis. In the second stage, the generalized method of moments was used to examine the impact of bank-specific and macroeconomic variables as well as regulation on bank performance, that is, profitability and efficiency. Considering bank size, the results show a diverse impact of regulation on bank performance. Regarding large- and medium-sized banks, regulation positively affects both efficiency and profitability, whereas, for small banks, it negatively affects performance. The results suggest that larger banks have skillfully adapted to the new regulatory environment. In contrast, small banks have problems with profitability and efficiency because the new regulatory framework has imposed additional administrative and regulatory burdens. This could result in future failure or mergers with larger banks, resulting in a higher concentration in the banking sector and increased systemic risk. Our results strongly suggest that regulation should not be implemented equally for all banks; that is, on a one size fits all terms. A distinction between small and large banks when introducing new regulatory frameworks should be made if a reasonable level of competition is to be preserved.

Does Regulation Only Bite the Less Profitable? Evidence from the Too‐Big‐To‐Fail Reforms

Adverse impact of capital regulatory reform and policy remedy: theory and evidence

Do financial regulators act in the public's interest? A Bayesian latent class estimation framework for assessing regulatory responses to banking crises

Size matters: analyzing bank profitability and efficiency under the Basel III framework

CAPITAL REQUIREMENT, "TOO MANY TO FAIL" BAILOUT AND SYSTEMIC RISK

Are "too big to fail" banks just different in size? – A study on systemic risk and stand-alone risk

A Overview of the Theoretical Literature of the Bank Capital Regulation

A New Capital Regulation for Large Financial Institutions

How Does Regulatory Pressure Shock Affect Firms’ Risk-Taking Behavior? Theory and Evidence

Regulatory Capital Management to Exceed Thresholds

Capital regulation induced reaching for systematic yield: Financial instability through fire sales

Too Big to Fail and Optimal Regulation

Bank leverage limits and risk-taking in the mortgage market: evidence from post-crisis reforms

Too Big to Fail: Toward an Optimal Regulation

Basel III capital surcharges for G-SIBs fail to control systemic risk and can cause pro-cyclical side effects

An Excursion-Theoretic Approach to Regulator's Bank Reorganization Problem

A Re-Examination of the Foundations of Cost of Capital for Regulatory Purposes

Bank regulation and supervision: A symbiotic relationship

Stand-alone vs systemic risk-taking of financial institutions

Financial Regulation in a Quantitative Model of The Modern Banking System

Bank competition, risk-taking and financial stability: insights from an emerging economy