Abstract:We can't deny the fact that banks play a key role in our society, while it is impossible to avoid banking crisis even under the strictest supervision. The current legal system in China for banking crisis management is imperfect. It lacks both sufficient means to resort to, and enough protection for individual depositors in case of a crisis. The main practices in foreign developed countries are the lender of last resort (LOLR), the deposit insurance system and Market-withdrawal system. LOLR aims to save the banks which run into payment crisis temporarily. Usually this operation is performed by a country's central bank. The deposit insurance system is designed to divert the risk. Once a bank crisis occurs, the deposit insurance institution will repay the depositors' deposit in certain proportion. In order to make banks adaptable to market competition, we should enact banks market withdrawal legislation.We need to improve our bank crisis management mechanism in following aspects: (a) improving the restructuring mechanism; (b) constructing the emergency measures; (c) improving the merge and bankruptcy system; (d) reforming the lender of last resort system; and (e) establishing the deposit insurance system as soon as possible. We need to enact detail rules to regulate the take-over system, including the definition, precondition, object, terms, limitation and redress of the take-over action. Apart from take-over system, we should form certain short-term contingency plans. Banks tend to merge to improve their competitiveness and some of them can't avoid bankruptcy in market economy, so we should enact relevant laws and regulations. Since abuses of LOLR system will result in disrupting the market competitive system and lead to moral hazard, it is necessary to formulate strict standards in order to apply LOLR system cautiously. The deposit insurance system, which has proven satisfactory in western developed countries for decades, needs to be established in our country as soon as possible.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENT, "TOO MANY TO FAIL" BAILOUT AND SYSTEMIC RISK

Reflection of the Banking Crisis Management in China from a Legal Perspective

Analysis of Two-phase Model of Bank's Risk-behaviors,Financial Supervision Errors and the Effectiveness of Capital Adequacy Requirements

A Overview of the Theoretical Literature of the Bank Capital Regulation

Monetary Policy, Capital Regulation and Systemic Risk in Commercial Banks: Evidence from in China

Analysis of China Commercial Banks’ Systemic Risk Sustainability through the Leave-One-Out Approach

Are "too big to fail" banks just different in size? – A study on systemic risk and stand-alone risk

Do Firm-Level Factors Play Forward-Looking Role for Financial Systemic Risk: Evidence from China

Adverse impact of capital regulatory reform and policy remedy: theory and evidence

Capital Regulation Reforms and Bank Risk-Taking in China

Capital Adequacy of Chinese Banks: Evaluation and Enhancement

Effect of capital constraints on risk preference behavior of commercial banks

Does Regulation Only Bite the Less Profitable? Evidence from the Too‐Big‐To‐Fail Reforms

Systemic Risk and Bank Failure

VAR and Stress Tests: The Impact of Fat-Tail Risk and Systemic Risk on Commercial Banks in Hong Kong and China

Bank Capital, Interbank Contagion, and Bailout Policy

Optimizing systemic risk through credit network reconstruction

Bank leverage and systemic risk: Impact of bank risk‐taking and inter‐bank business

Too Big to Fail: Toward an Optimal Regulation

Too Big to Fail and Optimal Regulation

Risk Assessment of Banks and Financial Institutions under COVID-19 Crisis