Abstract:The working hypothesis of international financial regulation is that it should be globally harmonized. This paper contends, to the contrary, that we should be wary about the efficacy of global harmonization, and in particular, harmonization of systemic risk measurement and regulation. The thesis is informed by what I consider two key lessons from the recent global financial crisis. The first lesson is that, when business strategies that internationally-harmonized regulation induces banks to follow go seriously awry, the adverse consequences will spread globally and not be limited to one regulator’s domain. The second lesson is that, innovations in financial technology that have been engines of prosperity across the globe also may contain the seeds of financial calamity with imprudent use and regulatory inattention. In addition, three kinds of uncertainty operate in this context: i) uncertainty regarding how best to define and measure systemic risk; (ii), dynamic uncertainty, that financial institutions respond to regulation in unpredictable ways that tend to undermine regulatory effectiveness; and (iii) radical uncertainty, that we do not know all possible future states of the financial system and therefore cannot compute the probabilities of outcomes that would be necessary for informing rules regarding systemic risk measures. The uncertainty in the regulatory context, in conjunction with the lessons from the crisis, suggest that a value-added international regulatory strategy would foster at least a modicum of diversity across national regulatory regimes, along with periodic updating of global standards. At the national level, they suggest adopting a dual-pronged regulatory approach that focuses regulators’ attention on monitoring developments in short-term debt markets, leverage levels, and the impact of new financial products and services, as well as on promoting experimentation, to better inform regulatory decisionmaking.

Basel III capital surcharges for G-SIBs fail to control systemic risk and can cause pro-cyclical side effects

Leverage-induced systemic risk under Basle II and other credit risk policies

Do interbank markets price systemic risk?

Elimination of systemic risk in financial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax

BANK PANICS AND FIRE SALES, INSOLVENCY AND ILLIQUIDITY

Network-Sensitive Financial Regulation

Measurement and Internalization of Systemic Risk in a Global Banking Network

Basel II procyclicality: The case of South Africa

Computing the Probability of a Financial Market Failure: A New Measure of Systemic Risk

Stand-alone vs systemic risk-taking of financial institutions

Does Regulation Only Bite the Less Profitable? Evidence from the Too‐Big‐To‐Fail Reforms

Business Cycle and Bank Capital Regulation: Basel II Procyclicality

Systemic Losses Due to Counter Party Risk in a Stylized Banking System

Any regulation of risk increases risk

Pitfalls of Global Harmonization of Systemic Risk Regulation in a World of Financial Innovation

Housing and credit market shocks: Exploring the role of rule-based Basel III counter-cyclical capital requirements

Systemic Risk Analysis of Multi-Layer Financial Network System Based on Multiple Interconnections between Banks, Firms, and Assets

The Effect of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer on the Stability of the Housing Market

Managing Default Contagion in Inhomogeneous Financial Networks

CAPITAL REQUIREMENT, "TOO MANY TO FAIL" BAILOUT AND SYSTEMIC RISK

Financial Regulation in a Quantitative Model of The Modern Banking System