Bank leverage limits and risk-taking in the mortgage market: evidence from post-crisis reforms

Fabrizio Almeida Marodin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4013905

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:As part of the Basel III framework, U.S. regulators introduced a minimum leverage ratio requirement on their largest banks, denominated Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR). Theoretical work on portfolio choice indicates that raising minimum bank leverage ratios can potentially induce increased risk-taking behavior. I test the hypothesis of an adjustment in risk and interest rate of mortgages originated by banks affected by the new SLR requirement, and evaluate consequences to local house prices. I find that (i) banks affected by the leverage limit increase overall risk-taking on mortgages; (ii) for home loans classified as higher priced, the effect is substantially amplified, interest rates are raised in order to adjust the return for risk, and riskier loans are kept longer in the balance sheet of originating banks; (iii) the aggregate increase in credit supply resulting from the adjustment is correlated with higher future home prices. Overall, there is evidence of heterogeneous effects of policy, in which borrowers of higher risk are more affected. The findings carry implications for the revision of post-crisis bank regulation. They indicate that a raise in bank leverage limits can coexist with the expansion of credit conditions, contradicting common claims of the banking industry against this form of capital requirement. At the same time, as leverage shifts from bankers' to borrowers' balance sheet, households become more exposed to risk once negative income shocks materialize.