Abstract:With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) based systems, a new era has begun. Decisions that were once made by humans are now increasingly being made by these advanced systems, with the inevitable consequence of our growing reliance on AI in many aspects of our lives. At the same time, the opaque nature of AI-based systems and the possibility of unintentional or hidden discriminatory practices and biases raises profound questions not only about the mechanics of AI, but also about how users perceive the fairness of these systems. We hypothesize that providing various explanations for AI decision-making processes and output may enhance users' fairness perceptions and make them trust the system and adopt its decisions. Hence, we devised an online between-subject experiment that explores users' fairness and comprehension perceptions of AI systems with respect to the explanations provided by the system, employing a case study of a managerial decision in the human resources (HR) domain. We manipulated (i) the decision-maker (AI or human); (ii) the input (candidate characteristics); (iii) the output (recommendation valence), and (iv) the explanation style. We examined the effect of the various manipulations (and individuals' demographic and personality characteristics) using multivariate ordinal regression. We also performed a multi-level analysis of experiment components to examine the effects of the decision-maker type, explanation style, and their combination. The results suggest three main conclusions. The first conclusion is that there is a gap in users' fairness and comprehension perception of AI-based decision making systems compared to human decision making. The second conclusion is that knowing that an AI-based system provided the decisions negatively affects users' fairness and comprehension perceptions, compared to knowing that humans made the decision. Finally, the third conclusion is that providing case-based, certification-based, or sensitivity-based explanations can narrow this gap and may even eliminate it. Additionally, we found that users' fairness and comprehension perceptions are influenced by a variety of factors such as the input, output, and explanation provided by the system, as well as by individuals' age, education, computer skills, and personality. Our findings may help to understand when and how to use explanations to improve users' perceptions regarding AI-based decision-making. CCS CONCEPTS • Human computer interaction (HCI) → HCI design and evaluation methods → User studies • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI) → Empirical studies in HCI • Applied computing → Law, social and behavioral sciences → Sociology

Who should be first? How and when AI-human order influences procedural justice in a multistage decision-making process

Can AI Algorithmic Decision-making Improve Employees’ Perception of Procedural Fairness?

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

AI Decision Making with Dignity? Contrasting Workers’ Justice Perceptions of Human and AI Decision Making in a Human Resource Management Context

Algorithmic Decision-making, Employees' Justice Perception and Deviant Behaviors: the Moderating Role of Decision Favorableness

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Replacing Humans in Making Human Resource Management Decisions on Fairness: A Case of Resume Screening

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Who Made That Decision and Why? Users' Perceptions of Human Versus AI Decision-Making and the Power of Explainable-AI

Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making

Perceived Fairness of Human Managers Compared with Artificial Intelligence in Employee Performance Evaluation

How Being Outvoted by AI Teammates Impacts Human-AI Collaboration

Team up with AI or Human? Investigating Candidates' Self-Categorization as Fluidity and Ingroup-Serving Attribution When Judged by a Human–AI Hybrid Jury

Fairness Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Path Forward

Impact of AI on Human Decision-Making: Analysis of Human, AI, and Environment of Interaction

Does AI help humans make better decisions? A statistical evaluation framework for experimental and observational studies

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Organizational Justice and Project Performance: A Systematic Literature and Science Mapping Review

Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-Making

Procedural Justice in Algorithmic Fairness

Human-Machine Collaborative Decision-Making in Organizations: Examining the Impact of Algorithm Prediction Bias on Decision Bias and Perceived Fairness

AI-induced indifference: Unfair AI reduces prosociality

Impression transference from AI to human: The impact of AI's fairness on interpersonal perception in AI-Mediated communication