Abstract:With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) based systems, a new era has begun. Decisions that were once made by humans are now increasingly being made by these advanced systems, with the inevitable consequence of our growing reliance on AI in many aspects of our lives. At the same time, the opaque nature of AI-based systems and the possibility of unintentional or hidden discriminatory practices and biases raises profound questions not only about the mechanics of AI, but also about how users perceive the fairness of these systems. We hypothesize that providing various explanations for AI decision-making processes and output may enhance users' fairness perceptions and make them trust the system and adopt its decisions. Hence, we devised an online between-subject experiment that explores users' fairness and comprehension perceptions of AI systems with respect to the explanations provided by the system, employing a case study of a managerial decision in the human resources (HR) domain. We manipulated (i) the decision-maker (AI or human); (ii) the input (candidate characteristics); (iii) the output (recommendation valence), and (iv) the explanation style. We examined the effect of the various manipulations (and individuals' demographic and personality characteristics) using multivariate ordinal regression. We also performed a multi-level analysis of experiment components to examine the effects of the decision-maker type, explanation style, and their combination. The results suggest three main conclusions. The first conclusion is that there is a gap in users' fairness and comprehension perception of AI-based decision making systems compared to human decision making. The second conclusion is that knowing that an AI-based system provided the decisions negatively affects users' fairness and comprehension perceptions, compared to knowing that humans made the decision. Finally, the third conclusion is that providing case-based, certification-based, or sensitivity-based explanations can narrow this gap and may even eliminate it. Additionally, we found that users' fairness and comprehension perceptions are influenced by a variety of factors such as the input, output, and explanation provided by the system, as well as by individuals' age, education, computer skills, and personality. Our findings may help to understand when and how to use explanations to improve users' perceptions regarding AI-based decision-making. CCS CONCEPTS • Human computer interaction (HCI) → HCI design and evaluation methods → User studies • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI) → Empirical studies in HCI • Applied computing → Law, social and behavioral sciences → Sociology

Team up with AI or Human? Investigating Candidates' Self-Categorization as Fluidity and Ingroup-Serving Attribution When Judged by a Human–AI Hybrid Jury

Applicants' Fairness Perception of Human and AI Collaboration in Resume Screening

Minority Social Influence and Moral Decision-Making in Human-Ai Interaction: the Effects of Identity and Specialization Cues

The impact of human-AI collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribution

How Being Outvoted by AI Teammates Impacts Human-AI Collaboration

Who should be first? How and when AI-human order influences procedural justice in a multistage decision-making process

Does AI help humans make better decisions? A statistical evaluation framework for experimental and observational studies

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration

Human–AI Communication in Initial Encounters: How AI Agency Affects Trust, Liking, and Chat Quality Evaluation

Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-Making

For Me or Against Me? Reactions to AI (vs. Human) Decisions That Are Favorable or Unfavorable to the Self and the Role of Fairness Perception

Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-Making

Designing Human-AI Systems: Anthropomorphism and Framing Bias on Human-AI Collaboration

Human Designers' Dynamic Confidence and Decision-Making When Working with More than One AI

Decision Making Strategies and Team Efficacy in Human-AI Teams

Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation

Who Made That Decision and Why? Users' Perceptions of Human Versus AI Decision-Making and the Power of Explainable-AI

Nationality, Race, and Ethnicity Biases in and Consequences of Detecting AI-Generated Self-Presentations

Adopting AI teammates in knowledge-intensive crowdsourcing contests: the roles of transparency and explainability

Perceptions of artificial intelligence system's aptitude to judge morality and competence amidst the rise of Chatbots